How to Build a Collaborative, High-Performing Legal Team
There has been remarkable momentum in the engagement of alternative legal services providers (ALSPs) by in-house counsel and law firms alike, but some are still striving to find that sweet spot where each team's expertise, efficiency and productivity align.
April 26, 2019 at 12:59 PM
5 minute read
Corporate legal departments have traditionally worked with external law firms to achieve their objectives, but in the past few years, this collaborative model has expanded to include a third party: the alternative legal services provider (ALSP). And while a recent Thomson Reuters report documents remarkable momentum in the engagement of ALSPs by in-house counsel and law firms alike, the three-party model is new enough that some are still striving to find that sweet spot where each team's expertise, efficiency and productivity align.
According to Thomson Reuters, corporate legal departments are increasing their use of ALSPs so quickly that many have already surpassed the 2021 projections they set forth in 2016 for ALSP involvement. They see value in using these firms because they enable in-house counsel to: (1) gain access to specialized expertise when they need it; (2) drive greater efficiencies; (3) farm out repetitive, time-consuming work to free up their internal team members to work on more strategic matters; (4) reduce costs; and (5) meet peak demand without increasing headcount.
The challenge is how to bring these advantages into the fold to benefit everyone—that is, how to create a WIN-WIN-WIN situation that ensures your legal department works as a well-oiled machine.
Be strategic in assessing talent and distributing work. When you fully understand the types and level of knowledge and expertise each party can provide, you can create a strategy that streamlines your processes, minimizes redundancy, reins in costs and enables you to better manage your departmental workflow. The key is making sure you have the right organizations doing the right things.
For example, many corporations don't see value in paying their law firms to do lower-level, time-consuming work such as document review and due diligence. They would prefer to use their ALSP partner for these tasks, because for certain services, an ALSP can charge less while providing the same high level of quality as a law firm. Law firms don't mind, because they would rather not expend their own staff resources on lower-profit work.
I learned this years ago, when a client reached out asking me to provide his outside counsel with 10 contract attorneys to assist on a litigation. My instinct was to apologize to the law firm, because I felt as though I was taking business away from them. They didn't see it that way at all. By collaborating with an ALSP, the firm knew they could continue doing the higher-priced, higher-profit work while our contract attorneys efficiently carried out the document review. So all three parties—the corporate legal department, the law firm and the ALSP—benefited.
This isn't to say that ALSPs can only do routine work—far from it. ALSPs staffed with top talent can also bolster your team in times of peak activity or bring subject-matter expertise to the mix when needed. Experienced contract attorneys can assist with licensing agreements, contract drafting, pre- and post-deal due diligence and integration, data protection and cybersecurity, regulatory compliance, lease review, ISDA agreements, employment matters, reorganization and more. The key is to determine where they can provide the most value to your department and how you can coordinate this with your internal team and your external counsel so that you are making the most of all of the talent that's available to you.
Communicate. Collaborative efforts can be effective only where productive, ongoing communication exists. Bring the parties together on the front end of every project and talk through the strategy so that everyone understands that this is a not a competition but a partnership. Clarify roles, responsibilities and expectations; discuss how teams will collaborate; and give people the opportunity to share their ideas and concerns.
Also be sure to spell out reporting requirements, emphasizing the need for transparency, so you can monitor progress and results. And set a standard for communication going forward—weekly update calls, for example.
Stay agile. Agility is one of the greatest benefits of using this three-party model. Think about it: If you're dealing with a lot of mergers and acquisitions this year, you can bring in strong M&A talent without having to hire additional full-time attorneys. Next year, your focus may move from M&A to employment issues, and so you can bring on lawyers with employment expertise. You can also be agile in staffing up or down as workflows fluctuate.
Because you have so many resources, you can pull together just the right team for your needs of the moment.
Keep an open mind about how you structure your teams for various assignments. The more you work with your collaborative partners, the more natural the arrangement will become and the easier it will be to determine exactly who should do what, depending on the circumstances. You may find that, through this strong collaboration, your legal department operates more smoothly and cost-effectively than ever before.
Leslie A. Firtell is an attorney and CEO of Tower Legal Solutions, which she founded in 2007. Tower Legal Solutions is a WBENC-certified woman-owned company, providing services in legal staffing, managed review, consulting, attorney engagements, contract management, and compliance. Firtell is an active member of the Women Presidents' Organization, which is dedicated to supporting and empowering women entrepreneurs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250