Latest Russia Corruption Stats Reveal Blind Spot in Enforcement Efforts
“These cases are not prosecuted. Large companies are not touched. They can feel safe that they're not subject to risk of prosecution by Russian authorities,” said a Moscow lawyer.
April 26, 2019 at 01:58 PM
3 minute read
Russian authorities launched 487 bribery investigations last year that led to 439 convictions, but virtually all of those cases targeted small and midsize businesses or individuals, according to a new report from European law firm Noerr.
The Munich-based firm analyzed the latest corruption enforcement statistics from the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation and found that authorities continue to turn a blind eye to large-scale corporate corruption.
“These cases are not prosecuted. Large companies are not touched. They can feel safe that they're not subject to risk of prosecution by Russian authorities,” Hannes Lubitzsch, who heads Noerr's compliance practice in Moscow, said in an interview Friday.
Michael Dobson, a former senior sanctions policy adviser for the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control and now of counsel at Morrison & Foerster in Washington, D.C., noted that “a lot of these larger players are directly or indirectly controlled by oligarchs.”
“To the extent that they are in the Kremlin's good graces, I am not at all surprised that they wouldn't find themselves in the targeting scope,” he said.
In Russia last year, the average penalty in a bribery case was 1 million rubles, or about $15,400, according to Lubitzsch. The nearly 440 corruption convictions in 2018 resulted in administrative fines totaling about $10.6 million. That pales in comparison to the $850 million fine that Russia's largest mobile network operator, Mobile TeleSystems, agreed to pay in March to settle a corruption case with U.S. authorities.
While Russian authorities appear to be interested primarily in pursuing minnows in the corruption pond, authorities in the U.S. and U.K. are increasingly going after the lunkers, according to Lubitzsch.
“What you should take into account in Russia is the foreign enforcement,” he added.
Noerr's report also showed that Russian prosecutors are ramping up on-site inspections to determine whether organizations, including Russian subsidiaries of foreign companies, have adopted anti-corruption compliance measures required under a 2012 law. But the law is silent on sanctions for noncompliance.
“Compliance in Russia is a fairly new concept,” Lubitzsch said. “And, for a typical Russian company, it's pure paper-based compliance.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All2024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Financial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-87
- 2The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 3Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 4Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 5Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250