Latest Russia Corruption Stats Reveal Blind Spot in Enforcement Efforts
“These cases are not prosecuted. Large companies are not touched. They can feel safe that they're not subject to risk of prosecution by Russian authorities,” said a Moscow lawyer.
April 26, 2019 at 01:58 PM
3 minute read
Russian authorities launched 487 bribery investigations last year that led to 439 convictions, but virtually all of those cases targeted small and midsize businesses or individuals, according to a new report from European law firm Noerr.
The Munich-based firm analyzed the latest corruption enforcement statistics from the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation and found that authorities continue to turn a blind eye to large-scale corporate corruption.
“These cases are not prosecuted. Large companies are not touched. They can feel safe that they're not subject to risk of prosecution by Russian authorities,” Hannes Lubitzsch, who heads Noerr's compliance practice in Moscow, said in an interview Friday.
Michael Dobson, a former senior sanctions policy adviser for the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control and now of counsel at Morrison & Foerster in Washington, D.C., noted that “a lot of these larger players are directly or indirectly controlled by oligarchs.”
“To the extent that they are in the Kremlin's good graces, I am not at all surprised that they wouldn't find themselves in the targeting scope,” he said.
In Russia last year, the average penalty in a bribery case was 1 million rubles, or about $15,400, according to Lubitzsch. The nearly 440 corruption convictions in 2018 resulted in administrative fines totaling about $10.6 million. That pales in comparison to the $850 million fine that Russia's largest mobile network operator, Mobile TeleSystems, agreed to pay in March to settle a corruption case with U.S. authorities.
While Russian authorities appear to be interested primarily in pursuing minnows in the corruption pond, authorities in the U.S. and U.K. are increasingly going after the lunkers, according to Lubitzsch.
“What you should take into account in Russia is the foreign enforcement,” he added.
Noerr's report also showed that Russian prosecutors are ramping up on-site inspections to determine whether organizations, including Russian subsidiaries of foreign companies, have adopted anti-corruption compliance measures required under a 2012 law. But the law is silent on sanctions for noncompliance.
“Compliance in Russia is a fairly new concept,” Lubitzsch said. “And, for a typical Russian company, it's pure paper-based compliance.”
Read More:
US Sanction of Russian Bank Shows OFAC's Broad Reach, Says Former Treasury Official
DOJ Cites Lack of Oversight in Bribery Case Against Russian Mobile Phone Company
Russian Mobile Phone Company MTS Is Cooperating in Probe by US DOJ and SEC
New Report Says Europe Now Has More Than Half of All Open Bribery Investigations
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNetflix Music Guru Becomes First GC of Startup Helping Independent Artists Monetize Catalogs
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Learning From Experience: The Best and Worst of Years Past
- 2Treasury GC Returns to Davis Polk to Co-Chair White-Collar Defense and Investigations Practice
- 3Decision of the Day: JFK to Paris Stowaway's Bail Revocation Explained
- 4Doug Emhoff, Husband of Former VP Harris, Lands at Willkie
- 5LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250