Report: Nearly Half of Employees Are Unaware of California Consumer Privacy Act
The report, based on a survey of 1,000 U.S.-based employees, shows that 46 percent of employees in the U.S. said they have never heard of the CCPA. The CCPA was passed last year and is set to take effect in January 2020.
April 30, 2019 at 06:19 PM
3 minute read
Nearly half of employees in the United States are unfamiliar with the California Consumer Privacy Act, according to a report published by consulting company MediaPRO on Tuesday.
The report, based on a survey of 1,000 U.S.-based employees, shows that 46 percent of employees in the U.S. said they have never heard of the CCPA. The CCPA was passed last year to add more consumer privacy rights to Californians such as allowing the consumer a right to request a business to disclose the personal information it collects on the consumer. The law is set to take effect in January 2020.
Tom Pendergast, the chief learning officer at MediaPRO, said he believes employees are unaware of the CCPA because of the oversaturation of data privacy-related news.
“The drumbeat of news around privacy issues is so intense that I wonder if people just start to tune it out,” Pendergast said.
Education plays a big role in employees learning about the CCPA. Pendergast said companies he personally works with are ahead of the curve on educating their employees. However, the results of the survey show a lack of education. Pendergast said he would expect companies to begin implementing policies on the CCPA during the second half of the year when all modifications to the law are finalized. But even then, it will be up to the legal department or the chief privacy officer of a company to spearhead that educational process.
“I don't think employees or the general population is paying any attention to the modification process going on with the CCPA,” Pendergast said.
Michelle Hon Donovan, a partner at Duane Morris in San Diego, said companies are just beginning to develop training on the CCPA. She said the policies are still at the executive level and ground employees have not been exposed to those policies or training on the CCPA.
Hon Donovan said the modification process is why companies were hesitant to act and implement new policies when the CCPA was passed last year. She said those working in cybersecurity and data privacy knew that when the CCPA was passed the law would need to be amended before it was enacted.
“It was done so quickly in order to get it passed before the ballot measure that we really were anticipating some cleanup and some changes before the law went into effect,” Hon Donovan said.
Despite the lack of awareness of the CCPA and employees' responsibility to make sure a company stays in compliance, the report shows most employees are aware of what type of information is the most sensitive. It also shows that a majority of employees know how to spot a potential cybercrime and whom to report it to.
“I think it reflects a lot on the fact that companies are implementing cybersecurity and training programs and that you see a lot more of this type of information in the news and being discussed in general,” Hon Donavan said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
Ben & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute read'It's Not About Speed': Forging Strong Legal Department-Law Firm Relationships Starts With Humility, Trust
6 minute readNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250