After Rapid Growth, Initiative Linking Female Legal Executives and Entrepreneurs Prepares for Takeoff
The Fourth Floor, a group that links business-savvy women in-house counsel with women entrepreneurs, is holding its beta launch next week. Since the community's founders announced their idea late last year, hundreds of women have applied to join the group.
May 07, 2019 at 04:25 PM
4 minute read
When the founders of The Fourth Floor, a new initiative connecting women in-house counsel with business experience to female entrepreneurs, began spreading their idea late last year, they expected some interest, mostly from people in their network.
But their idea spread faster and farther than planned. The three co-founders began receiving hundreds of messages from interested women professionals and sponsors, with more than 200 applicants from 10 U.S. cities and three countries.
“We had to take a step back because we were moving full steam ahead, just, 'Yeah, we have this idea.' But we received so much interest … we need to do this really thoughtfully and carefully,” said Sarah Feingold, the co-founder of The Fourth Floor who has served as general counsel of Vroom and senior counsel at Etsy. At a dinner event for women founders, she said the initiative was so popular they “ran out of business cards.”
The massive outpouring of support is, in part, what co-founder and Watermark Insights' top lawyer Breen Sullivan said pushed the initiative from “just being a thought” to a “tangible” community. The Fourth Floor officially launches next week with a May 13 event at Davis Wright & Tremaine's New York office.
While support for the initiative came seemingly overnight, it took time and planning to transform what Sullivan called “an impulse” into an organization ready to run. She, Feingold and third co-founder Aparna Srinivasan, the chief executive officer and co-founder of SpotOn, held five focus groups with more than 40 women general counsel and entrepreneurs this year.
Again, Feingold was surprised by the initiative's support. For her first focus group, Feingold brought “snacks”—a small plate of falafel she assumed she'd be eating alone. But within minutes, she said, the room filled up with women professionals ready to brainstorm.
The focus groups built relationships: corporate counsel and entrepreneurs met women like themselves seeking community. But it also helped The Fourth Floor's co-founders tweak their initial plans on how in-house counsel and startup founders would be paired. Feingold said the group had planned to hold “speed dating” sessions to pair counsel with startups.
“We felt like it was it too matchmaker. And there's that weird thing of chemistry,” Feingold said. “We don't want to force any founder to put someone we chose on their board, because it's a really important and deep role for your company, and it's a long-term commitment.”
Now, she said, group members will meet at curated in-person events where they can make more natural connections. Sullivan said inaugural cohorts will have around 20 women each.
Focus groups also showed The Fourth Floor co-founders that different participants sought different benefits from the initiative.
Women “industry leaders”—lawyers who have made it to their company's C-suite—may act as angel investors, while non-C-suite in-house counsel with at least eight years experience will work closely with entrepreneurs to give business advice from their experience working at companies.
For non-chief legal officers with hopes of sitting in the top lawyer spot, it's a chance to gain business credibility and a possible seat on the startup's board. And startups get input from legal business professionals with strategies to help guide the company.
“Understanding that connecting these two groups together, where now the lawyers … [get] an opportunity to serve as a strategic adviser for a startup, the value proposition for the lawyer is quite clear,” Sullivan said. “Because this is something we all want. This experience.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Tales From the Trenches: What Outside Counsel Do That GCs Find Inexcusable
Venus Williams Tells WIPL Crowd: 'Living Your Dreams Should Be Easy'
The 2024 WIPL Awards: Law Firm Mentor and Mentee Collaboration
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Decision of the Day: Judge Precludes Ballistics Expert's Opinion on Scene for 2016 Fatal Police Shooting
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-63
- 4Poll Workers Seek Contempt Against Rudy Giuliani, Alleging Continued Defamation
- 5$113k Sanction Award to Law Firm At Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250