Association of Corporate Counsel Panel: Data From Legal Operations Helps Drive Efficiencies
The Association of Corporate Counsel hosted a webinar with European legal operations experts to discuss driving efficiency in the legal department while a poll done at the beginning of the session indicated most of the audience just implemented legal operations functions at their companies.
May 07, 2019 at 03:00 PM
4 minute read
When starting a legal operations function, getting the entire legal department and other factions of the business on board may be a challenge but the data those functions collect is invaluable, according to a panel of European legal operations experts.
On Tuesday, the Association of Corporate Counsel hosted a webinar of European legal operations experts to discuss driving efficiency in the legal department. A poll done at the beginning of the session indicated that the majority of the audience had just implemented legal operations functions at their companies.
Leonie van Gulik, legal operations specialist at PVH Europe B.V., said her company is relatively new to legal operations. Van Gulik said she was brought in by the general counsel in August to help the legal department operate more efficiently.
“Optimizing legal services to the businesses and achieving efficiency for the legal department is a key part of my role,” van Gulik said. “Demand is everywhere. It starts with the general counsel and the leadership team.”
Van Gulik said she has the full support of the general counsel, but it has taken time for the legal team to buy in and truly understand what legal operations is. She said she is working to collect reliable data to inform decisions in the legal department.
A more mature function is likely to have collected data and use it to drive both business and legal decisions, the panel said.
At Visa, senior attorney Emma Jackson said her department developed two initiatives to streamline in-house legal services. The first is a portal that has frequently asked questions and template contracts that those in the business side can go to for answers without having to contact the legal department. The legal department at Visa also created a legal engagement form. The form was created in response to the lawyers feeling like they were not getting a lot of good information from the businesspeople for certain projects. When a businessperson needs to get in touch with the legal department for something that is not urgent, they fill out the form and then legal decides how to handle it and who would be the best lawyer for that particular task.
“One of the drivers for us wasn't necessarily to get good data and measure efficiency; it was to respond to the business which actually resulted in that data,” Jackson explained.
The data collected for finding efficiencies does not need to be perfect, Ben Eason, head of legal transformation at Barclays, said. He explained it is important to take in as much data as possible and then use it to make decisions.
“It doesn't need to be absolutely perfect data in order to drive activity and decisions,” Eason said. “You need to think about what it is you're looking for when you have this palpable data at your fingertips.
Jackson said at the end of each month they look at the different requests that came in through the engagement form and determine whether or not those requests can be self-serviced through the portal. Ultimately, she said, it has given Visa's legal department an insight on where it needs to focus its resources.
Stay on top of in-house developments with Inside Track, a weekly email that breaks down the news, flags key issues, answers your questions, and keeps track of who's on the move. Sign up here
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Puts Beat Down on Ex-Wrestling CEO Vince McMahon for Not Reporting Settlements
3 minute readDOJ Files Antitrust Suit to Block Amex GBT's Acquisition of Competitor
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250