Company Execs Could Face Individual Fines for Privacy Mishaps, FTC Commissioner Tells Congress
Federal Trade Commission officials told Congress members that executives could face individual fines for their companies' privacy violations to address concerns that massive fines are a drop in the bucket for larger corporations.
May 08, 2019 at 03:38 PM
3 minute read
Federal Trade Commission officials shared their privacy enforcement plans, including possible fines against company executives, with members of Congress on Wednesday at a hearing on enhancing data security protections.
In the wake of data mishaps at Facebook, Google and other U.S. tech companies last year, legislators have held a series of hearings in D.C. on privacy principles for a possible federal law. Some members of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce said Wednesday that the FTC's current enforcement system isn't enough to deter big companies from engaging in harmful data privacy practices.
Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Florida, said the agency's $5.7 million fine against Musical.ly, also known as TikTok, over alleged Children's Online Privacy Protection Act violations wasn't large enough, less than 1% of parent company ByteDance's annual revenue.
“No CEO is going to blink an eye at a fine that inconsequential,” Castor said. “Companies will just see small FTC fines as the cost of doing business and will continue to elevate profits over privacy.”
Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas, also raised concerns that “for large companies, fines are simply a cost of doing business.” He added a consent decree for “a company the size of Facebook” is inconsequential. Last month, Facebook's quarter earnings report stated the company plans to face a $3 billion to $5 billion FTC penalty over privacy mishaps. Facebook reported more than $55 billion in revenue last year.
FTC commissioner Rohit Chopra acknowledged that fines—even seemingly massive ones—have a smaller effect on big companies. He said the FTC does have the authority to penalize individuals for their companies' privacy law violations and that it's something the agency is “looking into.”
“For some firms, fines are a parking ticket and a cost of doing business,” Chopra said. “And we cannot change behavior unless those penalties are painful, and often that means finding out who at the top called the shots.”
At the International Association of Privacy Professionals Global Summit last week, FTC chairman Joseph Simons, who also testified at Wednesday's hearing, said fining individual executives was “on the [FTC's] radar,” but that he isn't “expecting to do this in every case.”
FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter noted Wednesday that ”unlike counterparts in Europe” the U.S. agency can't independently assess fines. Simons has repeatedly said that a federal privacy law would require more resources and enforcement authority for the FTC.
The agency currently has 40 employees focused on privacy, compared to around 140 at the Irish Data Protection Commission, which oversees Facebook, Twitter and other tech companies' compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation, and 500 at the U.K.'s Information Commissioner's Office.
Read More:
Facebook Expects Up to $5B Loss in Possible FTC Fine Over Data Privacy Mishaps
FTC Hits Musical.ly With Record-Setting $5.7M Fine Over COPPA Violations
GDPR Regulators, FTC Chairman Talk Privacy Law and Enforcement at IAPP Summit Panels
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250