What a Pal! General Counsel's Childhood Friend Accused of Peeking at Merger Documents, Insider Trading
Brett Fettner allegedly discovered that Cintas Corp. was working on a $2.2 billion merger while he was lacing up his golf shoes in the GC's den before a charity golf tournament in Cincinnati.
May 08, 2019 at 12:57 PM
4 minute read
A longtime friend of the general counsel of Cintas Corp. has agreed to pay more than $250,000 to settle allegations that he peeked at confidential merger documents while staying at the GC's house and used what he learned to perpetrate an insider trading scheme.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission alleged in a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida that Brett Fettner discovered that Cintas was poised to merge with G&K Services Inc. in what would be a $2.2 billion deal while he was lacing up his golf shoes in the GC's den before a charity golf tournament in Cincinnati.
The GC is not identified in the SEC's complaint. But Tom Frooman has served as the GC, senior vice president and secretary of Cintas since December 2001.
“While there [in the den], Fettner saw the folder with the merger documents on the desk and read at least some of the draft nondisclosure agreement between Cintas and G&K,” the SEC states in its complaint. “Fettner said nothing to his friend about having seen the merger documents in his house, and the two left for the golf course.”
Later that same day, Fettner bought 4,000 shares of G&K stock with a brokerage account for his ex-wife, the SEC alleges. Over the next few weeks, Fettner allegedly bought 3,600 more shares of G&K stock with his ex's account; picked up another 200 shares using his former girlfriend's account; and persuaded his current girlfriend to buy 300 shares of the stock and his father to buy 2,000 shares.
Fettner's attorney, James Sallah of Boca Raton, Florida, wrote in an email that his client was “pleased to have resolved this matter with the SEC in an amicable manner, and to have it behind him.”
Fettner appears to be a prominent Nevada sports agent who, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, built a $4 million custom home in 2016, the same year that he allegedly carried out the insider trading scheme. According to the SEC, Fettner and Cintas' GC attended middle and high school together and remained close into adulthood.
Cintas spokeswoman Michelle Goret wrote in an email that the Cincinnati-based uniform and commercial supplies company “takes our confidentiality obligations very seriously and took all reasonable steps to protect confidential information around the acquisition of G&K.”
“This complaint is the result of a third party obtaining information about that transaction in an inappropriate and illegal manner without the knowledge of any Cintas officer or employee,” she added.
After the Cintas-G&K merger was announced in August 2016, G&K stock appreciated by nearly 18%, jumping from $82.30 to $96.70 a share, which amounted to at least $250,000 in illicit profits stemming from Fettner's alleged unlawful trades.
Fettner agreed to pay a $252,995 penalty to settle with the SEC without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint. His ex-wife, Liselotte Sandberg, and his former girlfriend, Kathy Micali, who are named as relief defendants, consented to the entry of final judgment and agreed to disgorge their alleged illicit profits with prejudgment interest.
In announcing the settlement, which is pending court approval, Carolyn Welshhans, associate director of the SEC's enforcement division, stated, “Those who illegally use confidential information to financially benefit others will be held liable for their misconduct.”
“The penalty in this action takes such improper trading profits into account,” she added.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
Ben & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute read'It's Not About Speed': Forging Strong Legal Department-Law Firm Relationships Starts With Humility, Trust
6 minute readNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 2Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 3How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 4Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 5Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250