Companies Brace for New Round of US-China Trade Tensions
The new round of retaliatory tariffs in the U.S.-China trade war has caught many businesses off guard, according to international trade lawyers.
May 14, 2019 at 04:56 PM
4 minute read
Trade negotiations between the U.S. and China have devolved over the past few days with both sides announcing more aggressive retaliatory tariffs, much to the dismay of global businesses, according to international trade lawyers.
“It's really spooked clients,” said Mario Mancuso, a former official for the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States who now leads Kirkland & Ellis' international trade and national security practice in Washington, D.C.
“In the run-up to the trade negotiations last week, the market had priced in some resolution. There was a broad consensus—a soft consensus, but a consensus nonetheless—that there would be a trade deal,” he added. “Now we're hearing a lot of concern.”
On Friday, President Donald Trump followed through with a threat he made days earlier on Twitter and increased tariffs on $200 billion of imported Chinese goods from 10% to 25%. His administration is now poised to impose a 25% tariff on another $300 billion of goods, which essentially covers all imports from China.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has set a June 17 deadline for written comments on the planned tariff hike. On that same day, the USTR's Section 301 Committee is slated to hold a public hearing on the proposed tariffs, which could be enacted as early as June 24.
“That's an aggressive schedule. That's fast,” said Duane Layton, global head of Mayer Brown's international trade law practice in Washington, D.C. He added, “If you're making a product in the U.S. and bringing components or raw materials or inputs in from China, are you going to continue to bring those things in from China if you now have to pay a 25% tariff?”
Adams Lee, an international trade lawyer at Harris Bricken in Seattle, said he's been advising clients to “buckle up” for an “unpredictable, bumpy ride.” While both sides could negotiate a deal over the next few weeks, he expected that wouldn't happen and the U.S. would instead enact the proposed 25% tariff on virtually all Chinese imports.
“Once the USTR issues that federal registration notice—all those notices have gone into effect,” he said. “There's no reason to expect that the self-proclaimed “Tariff Man” is going to back down.”
China has denounced Trump's hardball negotiation tactics as “jeopardizing the interests of both sides and not meeting the general expectations of the international community.”
In response, China plans to slap new tariffs on another $60 billion of U.S exports, effective June 1. The forthcoming tariff hike covers a wide variety of U.S.-made goods, from honey and liquefied natural gas to cosmetics, vodka, toilet paper, printers and fire extinguishers.
At the same time, though, China has announced that it will, for the first time during the trade dispute, begin a tariff-exclusion process for certain U.S. imports, “according to China's interests.”
Read More:
Trump's Twitter Threat Shakes Up US-China Trade Talks, Stock Market
In-House Leaders Can Find Opportunity in Chaotic Trade Landscape
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNetflix Music Guru Becomes First GC of Startup Helping Independent Artists Monetize Catalogs
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Learning From Experience: The Best and Worst of Years Past
- 2Treasury GC Returns to Davis Polk to Co-Chair White-Collar Defense and Investigations Practice
- 3Decision of the Day: JFK to Paris Stowaway's Bail Revocation Explained
- 4Doug Emhoff, Husband of Former VP Harris, Lands at Willkie
- 5LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250