Companies Brace for New Round of US-China Trade Tensions
The new round of retaliatory tariffs in the U.S.-China trade war has caught many businesses off guard, according to international trade lawyers.
May 14, 2019 at 04:56 PM
4 minute read
Trade negotiations between the U.S. and China have devolved over the past few days with both sides announcing more aggressive retaliatory tariffs, much to the dismay of global businesses, according to international trade lawyers.
“It's really spooked clients,” said Mario Mancuso, a former official for the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States who now leads Kirkland & Ellis' international trade and national security practice in Washington, D.C.
“In the run-up to the trade negotiations last week, the market had priced in some resolution. There was a broad consensus—a soft consensus, but a consensus nonetheless—that there would be a trade deal,” he added. “Now we're hearing a lot of concern.”
On Friday, President Donald Trump followed through with a threat he made days earlier on Twitter and increased tariffs on $200 billion of imported Chinese goods from 10% to 25%. His administration is now poised to impose a 25% tariff on another $300 billion of goods, which essentially covers all imports from China.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has set a June 17 deadline for written comments on the planned tariff hike. On that same day, the USTR's Section 301 Committee is slated to hold a public hearing on the proposed tariffs, which could be enacted as early as June 24.
“That's an aggressive schedule. That's fast,” said Duane Layton, global head of Mayer Brown's international trade law practice in Washington, D.C. He added, “If you're making a product in the U.S. and bringing components or raw materials or inputs in from China, are you going to continue to bring those things in from China if you now have to pay a 25% tariff?”
Adams Lee, an international trade lawyer at Harris Bricken in Seattle, said he's been advising clients to “buckle up” for an “unpredictable, bumpy ride.” While both sides could negotiate a deal over the next few weeks, he expected that wouldn't happen and the U.S. would instead enact the proposed 25% tariff on virtually all Chinese imports.
“Once the USTR issues that federal registration notice—all those notices have gone into effect,” he said. “There's no reason to expect that the self-proclaimed “Tariff Man” is going to back down.”
China has denounced Trump's hardball negotiation tactics as “jeopardizing the interests of both sides and not meeting the general expectations of the international community.”
In response, China plans to slap new tariffs on another $60 billion of U.S exports, effective June 1. The forthcoming tariff hike covers a wide variety of U.S.-made goods, from honey and liquefied natural gas to cosmetics, vodka, toilet paper, printers and fire extinguishers.
At the same time, though, China has announced that it will, for the first time during the trade dispute, begin a tariff-exclusion process for certain U.S. imports, “according to China's interests.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250