Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives Need to Make Business Sense: A Q&A With Vania Wit of United Airlines
Vania Wit, a 2019 SuperConference panelist, spoke with Corporate Counsel about diversity and inclusion initiatives at United and a firm's responsibility in diversity and inclusion.
May 16, 2019 at 04:02 PM
5 minute read
Vania Wit has worked in the legal department at United Airlines for the past 20 years. Currently she serves as the airline's vice president and deputy general counsel. In her role, she is responsible for litigation, intellectual property, antitrust, labor employment and benefits, and legal operations and strategy.
Wit, who will be on a SuperConference panel on May 21 in Chicago, spoke with Corporate Counsel about diversity and inclusion initiatives at United and a firm's responsibility in diversity and inclusion. This conversation has been edited for clarity and length.
Corporate Counsel: What are some of United Airlines' initiatives when it comes to diversity and inclusion?
Vania Wit: We are focused on the retention side and the hiring side. We have our diversity and inclusion team that is creating and fostering a culture of inclusiveness. We have a lot of training initiatives that touch on inclusiveness and anti-bias. We also focus on holding our leaders accountable by making sure their teams are properly trained and are also inclusive in terms of their day-to-day management of people.
We strive to make sure that our pipeline of applicants are coming from all walks of life and have diverse backgrounds. We do a lot of outreach in the community as well. We fly all over the United States and throughout the world so being culturally sensitive and making sure that our employees represent our customers is important to us.
CC: Does United Airlines have any kind of guidelines for outside counsel when it comes to diversity and inclusion?
VW: We want to see that the teams working on our matters are diverse. We track it from year to year and we certainly don't want to see that things are moving in the wrong direction.
We are very mindful of who is responsible for managing our relationships. We want to make sure that our relationship points are reflective of who we are and that there is diversity among those ranks. For there to be real progress within firms, you have to have key partners that are diverse as well so they can keep the momentum going.
CC: In your experience, are law firms doing more than they have in the past when it comes to diversity and inclusion?
VW: I do think there has been progress with respect to outside firms in terms of them being more mindful and wanting to put their best foot forward because they appreciate that this is very important to their corporate clients. When I first started working here we were asking for demographic data and what I would consider more routine information.
I think in the beginning some firms would provide that information and others were a little resistant. Now, I think it has become more routine to ask for that kind of information and you certainly never get any push back. That information is woven into a lot of the marketing materials that we see when we are considering new firms.
You now have outside law firms that have their own diversity and inclusion teams. I don't think that was the case 15 years ago.
CC: Could law firms be doing more to promote diversity and inclusion?
VW: Virtually all firms, when asked questions about their D&I programs and what they're doing to foster diversity, will point to a lot of programs and a lot of initiatives that they have in place. I think that even with all of these initiatives, there still is a lot of room to grow. I wouldn't say their journey has ended by any means. I think it's something that they need to continually invest in and that some firms are better at it than others.
I also tend to think that unless their clients are asking for it [diversity and inclusion information], they don't pay as much attention to it as they should. There has to be an ongoing push forward from in-house counsel. I think it should be something everyone should be striving for.
CC: What would be your advice for in-house teams that may just be starting a diversity and inclusiveness initiative?
VW: You can't just focus on numbers and the initiative has to be presented to the department and to the internal client as an effort you want to initiate because it makes good business sense. There has to be an appreciation that one of the key reasons you're doing it is because you get better quality work product, you build better relationships and it is important for us as a company that when we have representatives from firms seeing our face that they are reflective of who we are. I would approach the initiation of a program with that kind of backdrop so it has the right foundation. If you approach it too superficially it can quickly get tossed aside and becomes more of a “check the box” exercise.
Join hundreds of general counsel and senior legal leaders at the 2019 SuperConference, the premier forum designed for and by general counsel from Fortune 1000 companies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoogle Fails to Secure Long-Term Stay of Order Requiring It to Open App Store to Rivals
'Am I Spending Time in the Right Place?' SPX Technologies CLO Cherée Johnson on Living and Leading With Intent
9 minute read'It Was the Next Graduation': How an In-House Lawyer Became a Serial Entrepreneur
9 minute readRenee Meisel, GC of UnitedLex, on Understanding and Growing the Business
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250