Larger GDPR Fines Are on the Way, Privacy Experts Say
As companies have to grapple with different regulations concerning data privacy, they also need to expect that European regulators will dole out higher fines on companies that violate the GDPR.
May 16, 2019 at 06:44 PM
3 minute read
Just shy of one year into the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, companies and their legal departments should double-check they are keeping up with the law or face fines and other punishments, according to experts.
The GDPR was implemented May 25, 2018, and in the first year fines were not as large as anticipated.
Todd Marlin, a principal and forensic data analytics and data science leader at Ernst & Young, said the average fine has been approximately 70,000 euros. He would also expect the fines to grow in size as time goes on.
"The largest fine has been 50 million euros, which is pretty small considering the regulation's standards," Marlin said.
The smaller fines are a result of an unofficial grace period from European regulators, said Odia Kagan, a partner a Fox Rothschild in Philadelphia and chair of the firm's GDPR compliance and international privacy practice.
Kagan said larger fines and other punishments are coming.
"The regulators that were interviewed prior to the implementation of GDPR have said they're not going to enforce the new obligations right away," Kagan said.
Kagan said, however, bigger fines are coming. She said it takes time to go through the process of finalizing those large fines. In January, Google was slapped with a $57 million fine from the French regulator. It took some time for the regulator to investigate the complaint and issue a fine considering the complaint against Google was among the first made when the GDPR was implemented.
The fines are not the worst kind of punishment European regulators can enforce on a company. Kagan said if regulators are notified about a breach and find companies did not do enough to protect the data, they can tell a company it has 90 days to remedy the situation or the company faces not being able to use the data that it collects.
"Companies can just pay the fine because they make more money than the fine," Kagan said. "If they're told they can't use the data; that is big."
Going forward, European regulators will want to see continued compliance rather than just having boxes checked, Kagan said.
One of the ongoing challenges is that corporations will have to remain compliant with the GDPR while focusing on new privacy regulations from different jurisdictions.
Marlin said companies have to decide how to proceed. Whether they want to remain compliant with just the GDPR may make sense in the immediate future, but is not a good long-term plan. Data protection, Marlin said, has become more than just a legal issue.
"It is an ongoing business process. Data never sleeps," Marlin said. "More and more jurisdictions are coming out with privacy statutes."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAd Agency Legal Chief Scores $12M Golden Parachute in $13B Sale to Rival
3 minute readFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pro Hac Vice in Georgia: Rule Change for Nonresident Attorneys
- 2The Benefits of E-Filing for Affordable, Effortless and Equal Access to Justice
- 3AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?
- 4A Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
- 5‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250