MCCA Report Shows Legal Departments Lag Behind Firms in Some Diversity and Inclusion Metrics
A new report from the MCCA shows legal departments still have room for improvement when it comes to workplace respect and making employees feel their voices are heard.
May 21, 2019 at 06:13 PM
3 minute read
Lawyers weighed in on their employers' inclusion strategies in new a Minority Corporate Counsel Association report that found, in some cases, legal departments are falling behind firms.
The report analyzed 2018 survey data from more than 600 legal industry professionals, with more than half working in-house and 38% at law firms, looking at lawyers' perceived levels of inclusion, fairness and respect at work.
Here's the good news for legal departments: in-house counsel were more likely to report feeling their workplace was fair, meaning hiring and promotion practices are seemingly merit-based. According to the MCCA's report, that's the “factor that has the single greatest impact on belonging for attorneys,” which is tied to higher retention and engagement rates.
But fairness scores reported by attorneys of color and LGBT lawyers at companies and firms are still lower than their white and heterosexual peers. Women on average gave their workplace a slightly lower fairness score than men.
Firms scored higher than in-house teams on two other key inclusion factors. Legal department employees reported lower average “voice and influence” ratings than firm counterparts. That indicates in-house counsel may not feel their input is factored into leaders' decisions, or that there's a lack of reporting structures.
“Open up formal opportunities not only for anonymous (e.g., via survey) feedback, but brown bag lunches, etc. where dialogue around diversity and inclusion IS the agenda,” said one respondent, an LGBT woman working for in-house counsel, in a statement included in the MCCA report.
Lawyers of color and LGBT attorneys were less likely than white or heterosexual respondents to feel they had influence at work, or that their voices were being heard. Women reported a higher average “voice and influence” score than men.
Legal department members also reported slightly lower “workplace respect” ratings than their peers at firms. But both groups gave employers relatively high average scores, nearly 4 out of 5.
These ratings were based on whether employees felt their colleagues treated them with respect regardless of their background. Again, people of color and LGBT lawyers—from firms and in-house teams—reported lower average scores than white or straight peers. One in-house respondent offered a suggestion to improve workplace climate and feelings of respect.
“Leadership could actively participate more in D&I events,” said the respondent. “They do a good job of encouraging these efforts, but they don't all participate or actually engage with the department in these events.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Tales From the Trenches: What Outside Counsel Do That GCs Find Inexcusable
Venus Williams Tells WIPL Crowd: 'Living Your Dreams Should Be Easy'
The 2024 WIPL Awards: Law Firm Mentor and Mentee Collaboration
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250