Facebook's Former General Counsel Counters Calls to Break Up the Company
"One of the things that's missing in a lot of this commentary is understanding that under antitrust law you actually have to prove a monopoly first, and its still not even close to clear that there is one for Facebook here," Chris Kelly, the former general counsel of Facebook, said Friday.
May 24, 2019 at 05:51 PM
3 minute read
The solution to concerns over Facebook's privacy practices isn't breaking up the company, its former general counsel and chief privacy officer told CNBC in a segment Friday morning.
Instead, Chris Kelly, who joined Facebook as its first in-house attorney in 2005, agreed with chief executive officer Mark Zuckerberg's Thursday statement that the company's size and resources gives it a better shot at providing a safe and secure platform.
He said companies must “actually have scale in order to address these problems” because of the heavy investment in artificial intelligence and machine learning required to stop the proliferation of misinformation, harmful content or data breaches on a platform.
Kelly's comments are in response to calls for the breakup of Menlo Park, California-based Facebook, which owns social media sites Instagram, WhatsApp and the Facebook platform, from the company's co-founder Chris Hughes. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, has also promised antitrust action against Facebook as part of her 2020 presidential campaign.
“One of the things that's missing in a lot of this commentary is understanding that under antitrust law you actually have to prove a monopoly first, and its still not even close to clear that there is one for Facebook here,” Kelly said. “And then from there you have to decide whether a structural remedy is appropriate.”
Kelly added that during his four years at the company Zuckerberg was interested in making Facebook a privacy-focused platform, “it's just not what some people have thought of as privacy.” Facebook's privacy focus, he said, meant allowing users to control who saw their posts but not to “avoid any accountability” for their actions on the site.
Zuckerberg said in March that Facebook would begin moving toward a “privacy-focused vision” for the platform, with encryption, reduced permanence and enhanced safety. Facebook has come under scrutiny since 2016 for a slew of scandal over data breaches, election-related misinformation and the spread of hate speech on its platform.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
InCloudCounsel Hires First GC to Continue Expansion in Asia
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
- 3Battle for Top Talent Accelerates Amid Profit and Demand Surge
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250