In-House Counsel Salaries Are Increasing, New Study Shows
The average annual salary of corporate counsel in all positions across all industries increased 4.4% from 2017 to 2018, according to the latest In-House Counsel Compensation Report from legal recruitment firm BarkerGilmore.
May 24, 2019 at 01:14 PM
3 minute read
In-house lawyers are bringing home fatter paychecks.
The average annual salary of corporate counsel in all positions across all industries increased 4.4% from 2017 to 2018, according to the latest In-House Counsel Compensation Report from legal recruitment firm BarkerGilmore.
“As compensation rises and long-term incentives and company benefits are factored in, becoming an in-house lawyer is an even more attractive career path,” said BarkerGilmore founding partner John Gilmore.
Unfortunately, the online survey of more than 2,000 U.S.-based in-house lawyers also showed that the gender pay gap persists, though it appears to be closing. On average, women in-house counsel bring home 85% of their male counterparts' pay, according to the report.
The gap is most striking among general counsel. Their gender pay disparity was 17% in 2018, when men had a total average compensation of $630,000, compared with $537,500 for women. But that's still a 5% improvement over 2017.
Also somewhat encouraging is the report's finding that the base pay for female in-house counsel at all levels increased at a rate of 4.5% last year, compared with 4.3% for men. The average total compensation last year for all women in-house counsel sampled in the survey was $313,782. For men it was $368,000.
“As predicted, the data show that the in-house counsel pay gap between men and women is beginning to narrow,” said Bob Barker, managing partner of BarkerGilmore. “While many have been slow to buy into the practice of not asking job applicants for current compensation, the new legislation [enacting pay history bans] is showing signs of achieving its objective.”
For the past three years, in-house lawyers for public companies had significantly higher salaries than those in the private sector. At the general counsel level, the disparity in total compensation was nearly 50% in 2018.
GCs for public technology companies had the highest pay rates, reporting average total compensation of $919,000. Their counterparts in the private tech sector made $405,000 on average.
GCs for public professional services, industrial and manufacturing, life sciences and financial companies all made more than $800,000 on average.
With an average compensation rate of $657,000, health care was the lowest-paying industry for GCs in the public sector. For lower level in-house counsel, the professional services and consumer industries paid the least.
Other findings from the report include:
- Grass is greener syndrome? Despite the finding that most in-house lawyers are getting larger checks, 41% of all respondents believed their pay was “below or significantly below” that of their peers at other firms.
- Perhaps unsurprisingly, 38% of in-house counsel indicated the desire for better pay would spur them to consider taking a new position within the next year.
- In-house lawyers in the financial and health care industries were most likely to be among the aforementioned potential job seekers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readWells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250