In-House Counsel Salaries Are Increasing, New Study Shows
The average annual salary of corporate counsel in all positions across all industries increased 4.4% from 2017 to 2018, according to the latest In-House Counsel Compensation Report from legal recruitment firm BarkerGilmore.
May 24, 2019 at 01:14 PM
3 minute read
In-house lawyers are bringing home fatter paychecks.
The average annual salary of corporate counsel in all positions across all industries increased 4.4% from 2017 to 2018, according to the latest In-House Counsel Compensation Report from legal recruitment firm BarkerGilmore.
“As compensation rises and long-term incentives and company benefits are factored in, becoming an in-house lawyer is an even more attractive career path,” said BarkerGilmore founding partner John Gilmore.
Unfortunately, the online survey of more than 2,000 U.S.-based in-house lawyers also showed that the gender pay gap persists, though it appears to be closing. On average, women in-house counsel bring home 85% of their male counterparts' pay, according to the report.
The gap is most striking among general counsel. Their gender pay disparity was 17% in 2018, when men had a total average compensation of $630,000, compared with $537,500 for women. But that's still a 5% improvement over 2017.
Also somewhat encouraging is the report's finding that the base pay for female in-house counsel at all levels increased at a rate of 4.5% last year, compared with 4.3% for men. The average total compensation last year for all women in-house counsel sampled in the survey was $313,782. For men it was $368,000.
“As predicted, the data show that the in-house counsel pay gap between men and women is beginning to narrow,” said Bob Barker, managing partner of BarkerGilmore. “While many have been slow to buy into the practice of not asking job applicants for current compensation, the new legislation [enacting pay history bans] is showing signs of achieving its objective.”
For the past three years, in-house lawyers for public companies had significantly higher salaries than those in the private sector. At the general counsel level, the disparity in total compensation was nearly 50% in 2018.
GCs for public technology companies had the highest pay rates, reporting average total compensation of $919,000. Their counterparts in the private tech sector made $405,000 on average.
GCs for public professional services, industrial and manufacturing, life sciences and financial companies all made more than $800,000 on average.
With an average compensation rate of $657,000, health care was the lowest-paying industry for GCs in the public sector. For lower level in-house counsel, the professional services and consumer industries paid the least.
Other findings from the report include:
- Grass is greener syndrome? Despite the finding that most in-house lawyers are getting larger checks, 41% of all respondents believed their pay was “below or significantly below” that of their peers at other firms.
- Perhaps unsurprisingly, 38% of in-house counsel indicated the desire for better pay would spur them to consider taking a new position within the next year.
- In-house lawyers in the financial and health care industries were most likely to be among the aforementioned potential job seekers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Ballooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
Am Law 100 Partners on Trump’s Short List to Replace Gensler as SEC Chair
4 minute readElon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250