Huawei's Chief Legal Officer Takes Center Stage in Conflict With US
The Chinese tech giant's CLO, Song Liuping, held a press conference Wednesday and criticized U.S. restrictions as "not normal" and an unconstitutional "trial by legislature."
May 29, 2019 at 01:53 PM
3 minute read
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd chief legal officer Song Liuping ratcheted up the Chinese tech giant's public relations offensive Wednesday, when he denounced the U.S. government's actions against his company as "not normal" and "trial by legislature."
Song also announced during a press conference in Shenzhen, China, that Huawei had just filed a motion for summary judgment in the Eastern District of Texas. The company is asking a federal judge to declare that the Trump administration's use of a provision in the National Defense Authorization Act to ban Huawei's equipment is unconstitutional.
"This legislation provides Huawei with no opportunity to defend ourselves or provide evidence. … This is 'trial by legislature,' and it is prohibited by the U.S. constitution," Song said. He later argued that Huawei does not pose a security threat and "U.S. politicians are using cybersecurity as an excuse to gain public support for actions that are designed to achieve other goals."
Adams Lee, an international trade lawyer at Harris Bricken in Seattle who represents U.S. and China companies, expressed some skepticism about the merits of Huawei's constitutional argument, at least at this stage in the lawsuit, which was filed in March.
"Speaking as a general observer, any time anyone raises a U.S. constitutional argument, that's usually kind of a Hail Mary type of argument," he said. "If you're using the kitchen sink approach, that's something you throw in to flavor the rest of the arguments you're using. If you're leading with that it doesn't sound like it's a terribly strong argument."
However, Lee, reflecting on the NDAA, added that "people have always complained about China's government actions being a top-down approach and no one's been able to decipher how China's actions are made or who comes up with these decisions. The U.S. is starting to become more like China in that way."
During the press conference, Song also spoke out against the U.S. Commerce Department's May 16 decision to add Huawei and nearly 70 of its affiliates in 26 countries to a trade blacklist. Song said the move could harm more than 3 billion Huawei customers in 170 countries, including 1,200 U.S. companies and residents in rural areas that lack access to affordable broadband networks.
"This will affect tens of thousands of American jobs," he added. "We believe this sets a dangerous precedent. Today it's telecoms and Huawei. Tomorrow it could be your industry, your company."
Read More:
Compliance Concerns Spike Over Huawei Trade Restrictions
Huawei Taps Jones Day, Morgan Lewis in Challenge to US Defense Law
US Businesses With Ties to Huawei Need to Prepare for Disruption
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAd Agency Legal Chief Scores $12M Golden Parachute in $13B Sale to Rival
3 minute readFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 2With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 3In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
- 4In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
- 5Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250