New Survey Shows Financial Institutions Still Losing the War on Money Laundering
The survey, "Global Regulatory Outlook 2019: Are We There Yet?," answers its title's own question—we're only part way there.
May 29, 2019 at 06:22 PM
4 minute read
A new compliance survey of financial executives reveals that while most financial firms rated themselves as being effective at anti-money laundering, some 30% rated at least one of their anti-money laundering components as being either “not at all effective” or only “somewhat effective.”
The survey, “Global Regulatory Outlook 2019: Are We There Yet?,” answers its title's own question—we're only part way there.
The survey was released this week by compliance consultant Duff & Phelps, who polled financial executives online in March and April. Over 180 respondents from a range of countries and financial service sectors participated, including asset/wealth managers, private equity hedge funds and banks among the top three groups.
The survey also highlighted other industry concerns for general counsel, chief compliance officers and risk managers. They included data protection and privacy, whistleblower programs, and big data and technology issues in general. But the money laundering worries stood out.
“Despite the very real progress that has been made, there is also a growing sense of regulatory fatigue—that we are unable to decisively turn the tide in the battle against financial crime, that there is never enough transparency,” wrote London-based Julian Korek, vice chairman of Duff & Phelps, in the report's preface.
The report said, “It is a war we are nowhere close to winning—or even fighting to a draw, as evidenced by a steady stream of high-profile news stories.” In less than a year major scandals have been exposed at Denmark's Danske Bank, Sweden's Swedbank, the U.K.'s Standard Chartered bank, and Russia's Troika Dialogue, which ran the so-called Troika Laundromat for shell companies.
All that despite the U.S. financial industry spending an estimated $25 billion on compliance efforts, while regulators have stepped up their scrutiny of financial institutions.
Attorney Ken Joseph, managing director and head of the disputes practice in Duff & Phelps' New York office, said the survey shows anti-money laundering is the top area of concern for general counsel, chief compliance officers and risk managers at financial institutions.
Joseph, who spent 21 years in enforcement at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, said general counsel, compliance officers and risk managers need to “play a significant role” in risk assessment at each entity. He said they should align their internal priorities with regulatory priorities and tailor each program to the business.
“They're not dragging their feet,” he said. “You'll find there may be a myriad of systems they have to collect information from, and the coding of data may not be consistent across an entity. The sheer volume of information to be processed, especially across jurisdictions, is quite daunting. The survey reflects there is room to grow there.”
One British expert agreed. Livia Benisty, head of financial crime in London for the regulatory technology firm ComplyAdvantage, said global financial crime amounts to $3 trillion a year, “and we are catching and stopping only 1% of that.”
She said a key part of the money laundering problem is the “incredibly complicated banking network with payments coming in, and going out, all over the world.”
Benisty said a second issue is that some of the larger scandals involved frontline staff being complicit in the schemes. “That's the hardest one to deal with,” she said, “because your business staff is your first line of defense. And if they are complicit in it, then there is an additional layer of problems.”
Still Benisty thinks there is hope to staunch the flow of illicit cash. She said most money laundering regulations didn't kick in until after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the U.S., and it took a few years to gear up. Other countries didn't join in until the U.S. began expanding its prosecutions globally, she said, so many countries are still catching up.
“I see it getting better,” Benisty said. “Technology will make a huge difference as we exponentially increase the capacity of our compliance tools to see things that human beings can't, to see the patterns and the matrixes.”
On the other hand, she warned, “We need to make sure that technology innovations to move money around the world do not outpace our efforts” to track it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Legal Departments’ Lack of Third-Party Oversight Leaving Small, Midsized Banks Exposed
4 minute readInside Track: How 2 Big Financial Stories—an Antitrust Case and a Megamerger—Became Intertwined
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250