New Survey Shows Financial Institutions Still Losing the War on Money Laundering
The survey, "Global Regulatory Outlook 2019: Are We There Yet?," answers its title's own question—we're only part way there.
May 29, 2019 at 06:22 PM
4 minute read
A new compliance survey of financial executives reveals that while most financial firms rated themselves as being effective at anti-money laundering, some 30% rated at least one of their anti-money laundering components as being either “not at all effective” or only “somewhat effective.”
The survey, “Global Regulatory Outlook 2019: Are We There Yet?,” answers its title's own question—we're only part way there.
The survey was released this week by compliance consultant Duff & Phelps, who polled financial executives online in March and April. Over 180 respondents from a range of countries and financial service sectors participated, including asset/wealth managers, private equity hedge funds and banks among the top three groups.
The survey also highlighted other industry concerns for general counsel, chief compliance officers and risk managers. They included data protection and privacy, whistleblower programs, and big data and technology issues in general. But the money laundering worries stood out.
“Despite the very real progress that has been made, there is also a growing sense of regulatory fatigue—that we are unable to decisively turn the tide in the battle against financial crime, that there is never enough transparency,” wrote London-based Julian Korek, vice chairman of Duff & Phelps, in the report's preface.
The report said, “It is a war we are nowhere close to winning—or even fighting to a draw, as evidenced by a steady stream of high-profile news stories.” In less than a year major scandals have been exposed at Denmark's Danske Bank, Sweden's Swedbank, the U.K.'s Standard Chartered bank, and Russia's Troika Dialogue, which ran the so-called Troika Laundromat for shell companies.
All that despite the U.S. financial industry spending an estimated $25 billion on compliance efforts, while regulators have stepped up their scrutiny of financial institutions.
Attorney Ken Joseph, managing director and head of the disputes practice in Duff & Phelps' New York office, said the survey shows anti-money laundering is the top area of concern for general counsel, chief compliance officers and risk managers at financial institutions.
Joseph, who spent 21 years in enforcement at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, said general counsel, compliance officers and risk managers need to “play a significant role” in risk assessment at each entity. He said they should align their internal priorities with regulatory priorities and tailor each program to the business.
“They're not dragging their feet,” he said. “You'll find there may be a myriad of systems they have to collect information from, and the coding of data may not be consistent across an entity. The sheer volume of information to be processed, especially across jurisdictions, is quite daunting. The survey reflects there is room to grow there.”
One British expert agreed. Livia Benisty, head of financial crime in London for the regulatory technology firm ComplyAdvantage, said global financial crime amounts to $3 trillion a year, “and we are catching and stopping only 1% of that.”
She said a key part of the money laundering problem is the “incredibly complicated banking network with payments coming in, and going out, all over the world.”
Benisty said a second issue is that some of the larger scandals involved frontline staff being complicit in the schemes. “That's the hardest one to deal with,” she said, “because your business staff is your first line of defense. And if they are complicit in it, then there is an additional layer of problems.”
Still Benisty thinks there is hope to staunch the flow of illicit cash. She said most money laundering regulations didn't kick in until after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the U.S., and it took a few years to gear up. Other countries didn't join in until the U.S. began expanding its prosecutions globally, she said, so many countries are still catching up.
“I see it getting better,” Benisty said. “Technology will make a huge difference as we exponentially increase the capacity of our compliance tools to see things that human beings can't, to see the patterns and the matrixes.”
On the other hand, she warned, “We need to make sure that technology innovations to move money around the world do not outpace our efforts” to track it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readWells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
Amex Latest Target as Regulators Scrutinize Whether Credit Card Issuers Deliver on Rewards Promises
Trending Stories
- 1Being a Profession is Not Malarkey
- 2Bring NJ's 'Pretrial Opportunity Program' into the Open
- 3High-Speed Crash With Police Vehicle Nets $1.6 Million Settlement
- 4Embracing a ‘Stronger Together’ Mentality: Collaboration Best Practices for Attorneys
- 5Selling Law. How to Get Hired, Paid and Rehired
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250