General Counsel, Stakeholders Still Await FDA Guidance for CBD
In-house lawyers and other industry executives are still waiting for regulations on CBD and CBD-infused products after the FDA held its first public comments session.
June 03, 2019 at 06:46 PM
3 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock.com
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently held its first public comments session on CBD and CBD-infused products, though it appears the agency is not any closer to regulating what is formally known as cannabidiol, the non-psychoactive ingredient often associated with cannabis.
"As far as the markets and the proponents of the CBD, the same is being said over and over," said Jean Gonnell, general counsel of STWC Holdings Inc. "Regulation and guidance is needed."
Steven Mister, president and CEO of the Council for Responsible Nutrition who gave comments at Friday's hearing, said the FDA is asking for safety information without giving companies a path to the market. He said part of the issue is the FDA held the hearing on CBD and cannabis, despite them being "very, very different."
"If you divorce CBD from its historical connection to marijuana, it's an herbal constituent like any other herbal constituent," Mister said.
While safety is important, Mister said, at this phase the FDA needs to allow CBD-infused products to exist in the market with the drugs CBD is an active ingredient in.
CBD was first studied for its drug properties, according to Mister, who previously served as associate general counsel of the Consumer Healthcare Products Association.
He explained a provision in the law states that if an article is first studied in clinical investigations as a drug before it's a supplement, then the drug "gets the monopoly over the ingredient."
"It has to do with this race to market to see who was there first," Mister said. "There is an exception in the law that says FDA can make a decision to allow the two to co-exist rather than giving the drug the monopoly."
Mister said the FDA had asked many stakeholders if they had safety information for the use of CBD products. However, he said, the responsible companies who would do those safety tests to produce the kinds of reports the FDA wants would not do so without a path to market.
"If you do that, all of these companies are going to jump in and do the safety studies that you want done," Mister said. "We're not saying the safety part is not important. But you've got to give companies a predictable pathway to market if you want them to do the safety studies you're expecting."
From an industry perspective, Gonnell said she would like to see any kind of guidance on CBD use.
"Anything that we can get from the federal government at this point would be incredibly helpful," Gonnell said. "The Farm Bill did great things for hemp, but there is still this gray area when it comes to CBD of where it can and cannot be used."
The public comments is not completely over. FDA is allowing for stakeholders to submit written comments up until July 2.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Advance Auto Parts Hires GC Who Climbed From Bottom to Top of Lowe's Legal Department Advance Auto Parts Hires GC Who Climbed From Bottom to Top of Lowe's Legal Department](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/416/2024/02/Advance-Auto-Parts-Store-1-767x633.jpg)
Advance Auto Parts Hires GC Who Climbed From Bottom to Top of Lowe's Legal Department
2 minute read![Compliance With EU AI Act Lags Behind as First Provisions Take Effect Compliance With EU AI Act Lags Behind as First Provisions Take Effect](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/25/7d/54707a6b409ca288c02206e94940/eu-artificial-intelligence-act-767x633.jpg)
Compliance With EU AI Act Lags Behind as First Provisions Take Effect
![State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-Day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-Day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/296/2020/08/lumber-construction-resized.jpg)
State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-Day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts
3 minute read![NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/29/d9/a50e79ac4b8b85966f53f223c3af/multiple-data-767x633.jpg)
NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office
Trending Stories
- 1'Translate Across Disciplines': Paul Hastings’ New Tech Transactions Leader
- 2Milbank’s Revenue and Profits Surge Following Demand Increases Across the Board
- 3Fourth Quarter Growth in Demand and Worked Rates Coincided with Countercyclical Dip, New Report Indicates
- 4Public Notices/Calendars
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250