Survey: In-House Departments Relying More on Alternative Legal Services
Sixty percent of respondents, which included legal operations professionals, attorneys and support staff of in-house legal departments, overwhelmingly said they used alternative legal services in 2018.
June 10, 2019 at 06:02 PM
3 minute read
A top initiative of legal departments for 2019 is to manage outside counsel spend, according to a recent survey by alternative legal service provider Tower Legal Solutions, which is driving the use of alternative legal services.
Nearly 60% of the 73 respondents, which included legal operations professionals, attorneys and support staff of in-house legal departments, indicated that managing outside counsel spend was a top priority for 2019. Also, 60% of the respondents overwhelmingly said they used alternative legal services in 2018.
“Over the last couple of years we've seen corporations implementing legal operations departments and it's to manage outside spend and also to bring in new operating procedures, implementing best practices and technology,” said Leslie Firtell, CEO and founder of Tower Legal Solutions.
Firtell also said the reasons alternative legal service providers are being used differ now from when she began working in alternative legal services 22 years ago. She explained when she started, legal departments were looking for extra workers because of staff shortages. Now alternative legal services are being used as a way to save money.
“Now people are putting on the brakes when it comes to engaging outside counsel for overflow work that can clearly be done in-house and freeing in-house attorneys up to do the more sophisticated work,” Firtell said.
Specifically when it comes to the use of alternative legal services, Firtell said she has seen an increase in the use of contract attorneys.
“There is no question in my mind why these alternative services have increased,” Firtell said.
Years ago, Firtell said she helped a general counsel of an entertainment company find a contract attorney to go over contracts. The attorney, who had been a seven-year associate at an international law firm, had left her job to start her own company but was still available to do some work. Firtell said the work was done for $110 an hour. If the general counsel had gone to a firm for the work, it would have paid $700 an hour.
“There has been a huge increase of contract attorneys in the market that are interested and available to do this type of work,” Firtell said.
Contracting attorneys appears to be how a majority of companies are using alternative legal services, with nearly 45% of the respondents indicating this type of use.
“It's very hard to say that it's not a winning proposition for everyone because the corporation is saving money and your own employees are not being swamped with work,” Firtell said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
4 minute readWhite Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
DLA Piper Adds Former Verizon GC Amid In-House Hiring Spree
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250