Canon and Toshiba Agree to Pay $5M to Settle Antitrust Case
The companies allegedly schemed to avoid federal antitrust laws and expedite Canon's $6.1 billion acquisition of Toshiba subsidiary Toshiba Medical Systems Corp. in 2016.
June 11, 2019 at 12:33 PM
4 minute read
Canon Inc. and Toshiba Corp. have agreed to pay $5 million to settle charges alleging that the Japanese companies schemed to circumvent federal antitrust and merger control laws so they could hasten a $6.1 billion deal in 2016.
The companies were required under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 to notify the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission and wait 30 days before Canon bought Toshiba subsidiary Toshiba Medical Systems Corp., or TMSC, a medical equipment company that did significant business in the United States.
The HSR Act's premerger notification requirement, which has tripped up Microsoft Corp. co-founder Bill Gates and Comcast Corp. CEO Brian Roberts, is meant to give federal authorities time to investigate and stop transactions that might run afoul of antitrust laws.
“Deliberately structuring a transaction to avoid or delay HSR filing undermines the efficacy of the premerger notification process, regardless of whether the parties' motives for doing so in a particular case were anti-competitive,” Bruce Hoffman, director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition, said in a written statement.
“We will be vigilant in seeking relief against attempts to circumvent the HSR Act's filing requirements,” he added.
The HSR Act's notification requirement and waiting period apparently stood in the way of Toshiba's desire to finalize the Canon deal before its 2015 fiscal year came to a close March 31, 2016.
Toshiba was in a “precarious financial position” at the time—an independent investigation had uncovered financial irregularities at the company—and wanted to use proceeds from the TMSC sale to bolster its financial statement, according to a complaint filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Instead of notifying federal authorities about the planned merger, Toshiba restructured the corporate ownership of TMSC and created a new class of voting shares with a single non-voting share custom-made for Canon, according to the complaint.
Toshiba allegedly sold the non-voting share and newly created options that were convertible to ordinary shares to Canon for $6.1 billion in March 2016. At the same time, Toshiba transferred the voting shares of TMSC to MS Holding Corp., a “special purpose company” that Toshiba and Canon created ahead of the merger, in exchange for a $900 payment. Months later, Canon exercised its options and obtained formal control of TMSC's voting shares.
A Toshiba spokesman wrote in an email that the company “reached a settlement with the DOJ, without any admission of violating US law, after recognizing that an early settlement was the best way forward, and that any dispute with the DOJ and FTC would consume the same resources and incur the same costs as civil proceedings.”
An attempt to speak with a Canon representative was unsuccessful. Jeff White of Weil, Gotshal & Manges represents Canon and Perry Lange of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr represents Toshiba. They did not respond to requests for comment.
Each company agreed to pay $2.5 million under the proposed settlement, which the court will consider following a 60-day comment period. Toshiba and Canon also agreed to implement a compliance program, designate a compliance officer to ensure compliance with merger notification laws and comply with various inspection and reporting requirements.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All2024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Financial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250