Airbnb's General Counsel Shows Up and Gets Creative to Promote Employee Ethics
Airbnb general counsel Rob Chesnut shared his role in educating employees on company ethics, including in-person training, creative videos and international visits, at the Peer 150 General Counsel Institute West at the UC Berkeley.
June 13, 2019 at 06:51 PM
4 minute read
Airbnb Inc. general counsel Robert Chesnut shared his work developing and promoting the San Francisco-based company's ethics culture globally at a Thursday event for in-house counsel.
Chesnut started his hourlong session, part of the two-day Peer 150 General Counsel Institute West at the University of California Berkeley, by directing in-house counsel where to start with ethics: the company's leadership.
“Nothing you can do can overcome a lack of leadership and integrity at the very top,” Chesnut said.
Airbnb's entire leadership team weighed in on ethical questions as the company developed its code of ethics, posing questions on romantic relationships at work, alcohol in the office and other real-world scenarios. Thinking through the tough questions helped Chesnut's executive team write a code of ethics that was specific, making rules clear and therefore easier to enforce. The code was also designed for Airbnb's culture, he added.
That's key, Chesnut said, because a code of ethics that seems copy-and-pasted, overly general or not drafted by executives can send a “horrible message” about how culture and ethics are valued at the company.
In his experience, a company-unique code of ethics is just the first step to embedding ethics into office culture. Executives should keep the issue top-of-mind by continuing to educate employees. He personally teaches the training class for all new Airbnb hires in San Francisco, one hour every week and has traveled to the company's 28 offices, training “over 5,000″ employees total.
It is crucial for employees see him in person, rather than a midlevel delegate, to know Airbnb is serious about ethics, he said.
“The message I've got is, 'Wow, Rob, I can't believe you do this. That takes an awful lot of time,'” he said. “My response is [it's] not as much time as it takes to deal with all the problems that are going to occur if I don't do this.”
Those trainings again offer specific examples on hugging, compliments and even barbecues with the boss, because “vagueness in the rules … creates a Petri dish for problems,” Chesnut said. Using examples employees can relate to also helps keep them more engaged, he added, and Airbnb uses post-training metrics to track how much employees soaked in on ethics.
Education doesn't stop at hiring. Chesnut and his team have found creative ways to keep employees engaged in ethics. His team now produces a monthly video series: semi-humorous, low-budget, with a moral. It's sent out to the entire company via email.
Employees don't have to watch the videos, but he said around 1,500 viewers usually tune in, familiarizing themselves with ethics and legal professionals at Airbnb while learning about specific moral issues they could face at work. He's gotten good feedback, requests from employees who want to star in the videos and seen the level of reporting spike post-publishing.
“The point isn't that you need to go do videos, although that may actually work perfectly well for you,” he said. “The point is you need to do something beyond that first initial orientation week to keep ethics at the top of mind for everyone in your company.”
Airbnb has an ethics reporting email, as well as a system of ethics advisers. The advisers are employees with separate full-time functions who volunteer to receive extra ethics training and serve as a touchpoint for those on their teams struggling with an ethical dilemma. Chesnut said that allows employees who may be nervous about going to legal to speak with someone they know about their issue.
The ethics advisers can flag when an issue repeatedly arises. Around once a year, they discuss what changes should be made, ethical concerns that currently lack clear answers. Having buy-in from employees outside of legal has helped embed ethics into Airbnb's culture more broadly, Chesnut said.
“The key is, [ethics] can't be owned by one person,” he said. “It's got to have broad ownership across the company.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoogle Fails to Secure Long-Term Stay of Order Requiring It to Open App Store to Rivals
'Am I Spending Time in the Right Place?' SPX Technologies CLO Cherée Johnson on Living and Leading With Intent
9 minute read'It Was the Next Graduation': How an In-House Lawyer Became a Serial Entrepreneur
9 minute readRenee Meisel, GC of UnitedLex, on Understanding and Growing the Business
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250