US Health Care Companies Overconfident About Data Privacy Management, Study Shows
Despite experiencing the second-largest amount of cybersecurity breaches, health care industry survey respondents reported that they were “very confident” or “extremely confident” in knowing exactly where sensitive data reside, although only half of them said they update their inventory of personal data once a year or less.
June 18, 2019 at 02:47 PM
3 minute read
When it comes to an awareness of what data they have and where it resides, health care organizations may suffer from overconfidence, despite experiencing the second-largest amount of cybersecurity breaches, suggests a new study on data privacy management within the industry.
Seventy percent of the survey respondents—made up of 258 top business executives and information technology decision makers within mid- to large-size U.S. companies—reported that they were “very confident” or “extremely confident” in knowing exactly where sensitive data resides. However, only half of the respondents said they update their inventory of personal data once a year or less.
“Because of the massive volume of data that people are dealing with, you really need to use technology to crawl that data to understand what's there,” Kristina Bergman, CEO and founder of data privacy automation provider Integris Software Inc., said in an interview. Then “companies can actively assess their risk and proactively make decisions about how to manage the data.”
The Seattle-based company conducted the survey, which it dubbed the Integris Software 2019 Healthcare Data and Privacy Maturity study.
The issue of not knowing what data a company has often arises in the context of mergers and acquisitions, particularly among those businesses that acquire smaller ones, and in the case of data transfer agreements, especially with credit card processors or third parties, Bergman said, adding that the oversight generally is not negligent.
“The reality is that the people who are negotiating those agreements, the lawyers and [business representatives], are not the same people who are opening up the pipes and transferring the data,” she said. “The IT people aren't reading and checking the contract.”
To help remedy this unawareness, Bergman suggests continuously and automatically monitoring and mapping the sensitive data that companies collect and store across locations.
“It is good to know immediately, which will catch things before they become issues,” she said.
Other findings from the survey include:
- Respondents were much more confident in their own ability to respect data-sharing agreements than their partners' ability to reciprocate in kind, with a nearly 61% increase in “very confident” and “extremely confident” levels in their own compliance efforts versus their partners.
- The health care industry is better prepared for security compliance mandates than other industries, with 35% scoring themselves as “fully prepared” for the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, though only 16% said they were “fully prepared” for the California Consumer Privacy Act.
- Organizations are using several types of tools to discover and track the location of personal information, including surveys and spreadsheets, metadata management and data catalog.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Fatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readFTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readHealth Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250