Which Face Does Your Chief Legal Officer Wear Most?
As CLOs increasingly report directly to CEOs, how can they balance legal and strategic demands on their time
June 19, 2019 at 04:30 PM
5 minute read
The role of today's chief legal officer (CLO) has evolved into that of both a strategic contributor and senior executive. In fact, the ACC Chief Legal Officers 2019 Survey found that 78% of U.S. CLOs and 93% of Fortune 500 CLOs report directly to their company's top executive. Further, over 75% provide input on business decisions to executive leaders including the CEO and board.
But as expectations for CLOs ratchet up, how can those legal leaders be successful balancing necessary team management work with the need to meet and exceed responsibilities at the leadership table? Dividing time between “four faces”—guardian, operator, catalyst and strategist—may help.
The Four Faces of the CLO
Guardian: In the guardian role, CLOs focus most on defense of the business—the foundational responsibility for corporate counsel. They guide legal and regulatory matters for the business, mitigating often risks like those in corporate integrity, brand and reputation and governance.
Operator: As operators, CLOs focus on optimizing the talent, capabilities, service levels, costs and legal structure needed to best serve the business. For the in-house counsel team, the CLO as operator fosters professional development programs, identifies and remedies subject matter expertise and technology gaps and improves effectiveness of the legal operating model. With outside counsel, the CLO as an operator develops and implements performance metrics, while also forecasting and reporting on legal spend.
Catalyst: When CLOs act as catalysts, they challenge the status quo as a change agent highly focused on helping executive leadership select the right path forward. To do so, CLOs as catalysts focus on enabling competitive advantage via critical legal guidance by assessing business practices and then building or strengthening areas of the organization including its risk profile, compliance framework and corporate culture.
Strategist: As a strategist, CLOs can help align clear a legal strategy that supports business strategy and enables value creation. Beyond building strong relationships with leadership teams and board members, CLOs as strategists understand business strategy and value creation leavers as well as changes in regulatory requirements and public policy, reflecting them all in legal strategy.
|The Time Allocation Challenge
Deloitte interviews with executive leaders indicate that most CEOs and boards want the full C-suite to spend the majority of their time—about 60% to 70% — on catalyst and strategist work, with just 30 to 40% in the guardian and operator roles.
However, many new CLOs have told us that their time allocation is often the reverse of CEO and board requests.
Even experienced CLOs sometimes find it difficult to align their time allocation to meet the expectations of the CEO and board. However, the difference between new and experienced CLOs seems to be the ability to spend less time on operator work and contribute more to strategist work.
It's important to note that while experienced CLOs we interviewed want to spend more time than new CLOs on catalyst and strategist work, both new and experienced CLOs we spoke to wanted to allocate more time to their catalyst and strategist roles.
|Tackling the Time Crunch by Prioritizing Talent
Shifting a new or experienced CLO's time into more strategist and catalyst work takes prioritization of legal operations. If an organization doesn't already have a strong legal operations leader in place to manage guardian and operator work, finding one should take top priority. The top regret we've heard from new CLOs around their first anniversary in-role is that they didn't make talent decisions sooner, neglecting to put the right people in the right roles, reorganizing the team, or separating individuals who are difficult or have skills that aren't aligned to department needs.
Not all CLOs are interested in transitioning away from guardian and operator roles, as they've become comfortable in those roles and well rewarded for them over time. But the failure to transition can be interpreted by the rest of the C-suite as an inability to contribute on a strategic, executive level. A successful transition, however, creates opportunities for competitive advantage—both for the business and the legal leader.
Lori Lorenzo is managing director at Deloitte Transactions and Business Analytics LLP and leader of Deloitte's chief legal officer program, focusing on how general counsel and legal teams can elevate their careers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1TikTok Law and TikTok Politics
- 2California Supreme Court Vacates Murder Conviction in Infant Abuse Case
- 3New York’s Proposed Legislation Restraining Transfer of Real Property
- 4Withers Hires Lawyers, Staff From LA Trusts and Estates Boutique
- 5To Speed Criminal Discovery, NY Bill Proposes Police-to-Prosecutor Pipeline For Records
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250