Ex-Hertz General Counsel Moves to Dismiss Company Suit Seeking $200M for Alleged Accounting Misconduct
Jeffrey Zimmerman, top lawyer at the rental car giant from 2007 to 2014, argued in a motion to dismiss filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on Thursday that his former employer failed to adequately allege that its ex-top lawyer engaged in gross negligence and misconduct that forced the company to restate its financial statements in 2011, 2012 and 2013.
June 21, 2019 at 01:50 PM
4 minute read
The Hertz Corp. former general counsel Jeffrey Zimmerman has asked a New Jersey federal court to dismiss a lawsuit accusing him and two other ex-top executives of owing the rental car giant more than $200 million in legal fees and other costs related to misstating company income.
Zimmerman argued in a motion to dismiss filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on Thursday that his former employer failed to adequately allege its ex-top lawyer engaged in gross negligence and misconduct that forced the company to restate its financial statements in 2011, 2012 and 2013.
“The complaint is nothing more than a series of vague, general allegations against all defendants, alleging that they collectively failed to correct accounting errors and weaknesses in the company's internal controls,” according to the motion, referring to co-defendants former Hertz CEO Mark Frissora and then-chief financial officer Elyse Douglas.
Specifically, it continued, the complaint contains only two allegations against Zimmerman: that he was urged by Frissora to review legal reserves twice during 2013 and that he knew about “possible” improper payments to Brazilian government officials.
“Neither claim alleges any actual misconduct by Zimmerman, nor does Hertz allege any connection between these allegations and the [restatement of finances],” the motion said. “Hertz's allegations come nowhere close to supporting an inference of gross negligence or misconduct by Zimmerman.”
Neither Zimmerman's attorney, Vincent Connelly of the Chicago office of Mayer Brown, nor Hertz attorney Herbert Beigel, who owns Herbert Beigel & Associates in Tucson, Arizona, immediately responded to emailed requests for comment. Zimmerman, who served as GC from December 2007 until he resigned in December 2014, could not be reached for comment.
Hertz's suit also states that “defendants' wrongful 'tone at the top' was a form of misconduct and gross negligence because it exacerbated various risk factors,” and led to inadequate internal controls and “a plethora of accounting errors.”
It also accuses the trio of “supporting” the 2012 acquisition of Hertz's competitor Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group and the relocation of Hertz's headquarters from Park Ridge, New Jersey, to Estero, Florida, after the merger—a decision that, the lawsuit claims, led to the departure of more than half of Hertz's corporate office personnel.
“In effect, Hertz alleges that the company's executives made a series of business decisions with regrettable results,” Zimmerman's motion states. “These allegations are insufficient to state a claim against any of the defendants, let alone Zimmerman. Hertz does not (and could not) claim that Zimmerman's role as general counsel involved control over the company's accounting department, accounting methodology, the integration of another company into Hertz's systems, the physical location of Hertz's headquarters, or the decision of Hertz employees to leave the company.”
In addition, Hertz's suit also claims that Zimmerman violated his separation agreement by allegedly falsely stating that he had not engaged in gross negligence and misconduct and thus owes more than $200 million in investigative, legal and remediation costs associated with the financial restatement, including a settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
“The alleged connection between these damages and Zimmerman's conduct is illogical because Zimmerman's separation agreement was signed after all these alleged damages were incurred,” according to the motion. A “class action lawsuit was filed in 2013, the SEC investigation was opened in June 2014, and Hertz's own internal investigation through outside counsel was substantially complete before Hertz and Zimmerman entered into the separation agreement in December 2014.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Who Helped Fanatics Pull Off Growth Tear Joins Acquisitive Provider of Live Event Logistics
Norfolk Southern Replaces Fired CLO With Fast-Rising Internal Candidate
Norfolk Southern Fires Legal Chief and CEO, Saying They Had Inappropriate Relationship
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250