Lawmakers Ask Big Tech for Their Outside Counsel's Diversity Stats
Members of Congress are pushing tech's 10 biggest companies to disclose their diversity practices when hiring outside counsel, in a letter sent to Apple, Alphabet, Facebook and others Friday.
June 21, 2019 at 03:04 PM
3 minute read
Members of Congress asked tech's biggest companies to disclose their outside counsel diversity hiring practices in a letter sent Friday.
Tech companies' outside counsel weigh in on “issues deeply affecting this nation's varied populations” and therefore should be as diverse as the populations their decisions impact, wrote five Democrat members of Congress in Friday's letter.
Yet, they added, some tech companies have failed to realize both the “full effect of their products” and importance of “sufficiently diverse advice.”
“With [tech's] level of influence, these companies must ensure that diverse perspectives are present in their decision making at every point in their organizational structures—and that includes the firms they hire for legal counsel,” said Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-New Jersey.
The message comes as firms face increased pressure to diversify their ranks from in-house counsel. In January, more than 170 general counsel, including some tech industry lawyers, penned a letter threatening to pull their business from firms not trying to improve diversity and inclusion efforts.
Friday's letter was sent to the chief executive officers of the tech industry's 10 largest companies by revenue: Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Alphabet Inc., Microsoft Corp., IBM Corp., Dell, Intel Corp., HP, Cisco Systems Inc. and Facebook Inc. HP and Microsoft both have public diversity requirements in place for outside counsel.
Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, D-Missouri, led efforts to draft and send the letter. He said in an interview that the letter was addressed to CEOs rather than general counsel because he wanted to raise awareness at the top and outside of legal departments.
Lawmakers pushed CEOs on whether legal department spend is held accountable to supplier diversity program requirements and what percent of legal spend annually goes to women- and minority-owned firms.
The representatives also asked if and how tech companies are pushing big law firms to diversify. Criteria used to measure diversity in outside counsel selection, the size of diversity as a factor in outside counsel selection and formal promises made by in-house teams to hold firms accountable are all questions raised Friday.
“We're now seeing how the lack of diverse legal teams limit the background and viewpoints needed when dealing with issues that arise,” said Rep. Barbara Lee, D-California. “It is essential that these companies advocate directly for more diverse hiring, including holding firms that do not meet diversity standards financially accountable.”
Reps. Robin Kelly, D-Illinois and G.K. Butterfield, D-North Carolina, also signed Friday's letter.
Cisco chief legal counselor Mark Chandler said in an emailed statement his company's executives “welcome the CBC's inquiry, which draws good attention to the opportunity that all companies have to use vendor hiring practices as a vehicle to promote diversity and opportunity.” Microsoft did not have additional comment, and the other eight companies did not immediately responded to request for comment.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
InCloudCounsel Hires First GC to Continue Expansion in Asia
Trending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250