Settlement Details Show How Walmart Restricted Scope of Compliance Monitor
Jay Jorgensen, former executive vice president and global chief ethics and compliance officer at Walmart, said the in-house lawyers and compliance team showed monitor Louis Freeh how they had built a state-of-the-art compliance program to remediate the problem. The DOJ, however, was not impressed.
June 24, 2019 at 06:39 PM
4 minute read
One of the most unusual factors about the long-awaited Walmart Inc. foreign bribery settlement last week was its treatment of the compliance monitor.
Attached to the end of the nonprosecution agreement between the company and the U.S. Department of Justice was a 14-page section describing in meticulous detail the monitor's duties and timetable for completing them.
Laura Perkins, a partner in Hughes Hubbard & Reed's Washington, D.C., office and co-chair of the anti-corruption and internal investigations practice, said she was surprised by the wording in the attachment.
“It's not the usual form language,” Perkins said. “The monitor's mandate is more limited by this agreement; it's restricted to certain countries and certain business lines.” The countries involved were Brazil, China, India and Mexico.
Another surprising aspect, she said, was the agreement makes clear Walmart hired the monitor prior to signing the deal.
It states, “The company retained the monitor prior to the date on which the company's nonprosecution agreement is executed for the purposes of preparing a written work plan, as described below.”
Perkins said, “That's different. Normally a work plan is determined after the monitor studies what should be looked at using a risk-based approach.”
Jay Jorgensen, who until recently was executive vice president and global chief ethics and compliance officer at Walmart, confirmed the company hired former FBI director Louis Freeh as its monitor, and that Freeh began working several months before Jorgensen left the company in December.
Jorgensen, now general counsel and chief compliance officer at the South Korean e-commerce company Coupang, said the in-house lawyers and compliance team showed Freeh how they had built a state-of-the-art compliance program to remediate the problem.
“We didn't just build a compliance program,” Jorgensen said. “We literally mapped out every recommendation that any U.S. or international government agency or expert group has made about compliance programs. And we tried to implement all of them—every best practice, policy and process. It was costly.”
DOJ, however, was not impressed. The agreement states, “Although the company has engaged in significant remedial measures, the fraud section and the [department] have determined that an independent compliance monitor is necessary to ensure that the company's compliance program is operating effectively and adequately tested to ensure that it meets the minimum elements set forth in the corporate compliance program.”
The agreement states the company presented three qualified candidates to federal prosecutors, and the DOJ made the final choice of Freeh.
Under terms of the three-year agreement, Freeh serves for up to two years. His term can be terminated early if all parties agree that his mandate has been met. The DOJ also reserved the right to extend his term another year if his mandate has not been met.
Karen Hewitt, a partner at Jones Day in San Diego, helped negotiate and signed the agreement for Walmart. It was also signed by Gordon Allison, Walmart's chief counsel for finance and corporate governance.
Freeh, a Rutgers Law School graduate, first worked as an FBI agent and then as an assistant U.S. attorney. He served as a U.S. district judge in the Southern District of New York from 1991 to 1993, when he was named FBI director, a position he held until May 2001. He was general counsel to MBNA America Bank from 2001 until it was acquired by Bank of America in 2007.
The following year he founded the global risk management firm Freeh Group International Solutions, headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware, with regional offices in Washington, D.C., New York, Los Angeles and Palm Beach, Florida. He also formed an affiliated law firm, Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan, with two other former federal judges: Eugene Sullivan and Stanley Sporkin.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute read$25M Grubhub Settlement Sheds Light on How Other Gig Economy Firms Can Avoid Regulatory Trouble
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250