Survey: Most Companies Will Reduce Legal Spend in the Next 2 Years
The rising salaries of lawyers, according to the survey, are one reason legal departments have to find areas to cut costs.
June 24, 2019 at 05:01 PM
3 minute read
Rising business costs and offering competitive salaries are some of the reasons that 82% of in-house legal leaders will be forced to cut legal spend over the next two years, according to EY's “Reimagining the Legal Function Report 2019.”
That could be the result of greater oversight from executives outside of legal, according to the report. Thirty-seven percent of respondents indicated that over the next two years, they plan on cutting legal spend by 11% to 20%. Eighteen percent of respondents indicated they do not plan on cutting legal spending. The rising salaries of lawyers, according to the survey, are one reason legal departments have to find areas to cut costs.
“Lawyers' salaries have been on a steep upward trend in markets like London, and therefore firms pay hefty salaries to attract mid‑career or newly qualified lawyers,” EY Riverview Law CEO Chris Price said in the report. “Having made the hire, the legal function is then forced to keep up with private practice salary expectations, often outstripping their internal counterparts' salary increments.”
But even with the right pay, 59% of respondents indicated they struggle with attracting talent.
“The recruitment challenge for legal teams seeking junior lawyers is to attract them with meaningful work, not routine activities, and demonstrate the potential for career progression,” Paula Hogéus, EY global labor and employment law leader, said in the report.
The options that firm attorneys who want to leave private practice have broadened. Before, firm attorneys would want to go in-house to be more involved with the business. Hogéus said that now lawyers have the option of working on a contractual basis and roles in legal tech startups.
Another issue is finding ways to give new in-house attorneys meaningful work, rather than menial tasks.
“The recruitment challenge for legal teams seeking junior lawyers is to attract them with meaningful work, not routine activities, and demonstrate the potential for career progression,” Hogéus said.
In order to find meaningful tasks for junior in-house employees, businesses are beginning to outsource those more menial tasks. Thirty-three percent of businesses indicated they are already outsourcing tasks such as contract management, entity management and document retention.
“Smart procurement practices mean that outsourcing these activities to a single service provider, usually at a fixed or commoditized fee, removes the need for the legal function or company secretariat to work out how to deliver these activities,” Mike Fry, EY head of global compliance, said in the report.
A spokesperson for EY did not respond to request for additional comment on the survey results. EY surveyed 1,058 senior legal practitioners from businesses in 25 countries for the results of the survey.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readEx-Red Robin CLO Joins Norton Rose Fulbright After Helping Sell Latest Employer for $4.9 Billion
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250