As Michigan State Awaits General Counsel, It Votes for Independent Nassar Probe
The university said June 21 it is hiring McDermott Will & Emery to conduct a probe three years after convicted ex-doctor Larry Nassar's arrest in 2016.
June 25, 2019 at 05:26 PM
4 minute read
While Michigan State University waits to hire its third general counsel in just over a year, its board of trustees has decided to hire a law firm to conduct an independent investigation into the Larry Nassar sexual abuse scandal and to make that report public.
The timing is highly unusual. Normally a school learns of a problem and orders an internal investigation immediately. But Michigan State said June 21 it is hiring McDermott Will & Emery to conduct a probe three years after Nassar's arrest in 2016.
“The past history of failed investigations of Nassar at Michigan State distinguishes this case from the norm and warrants a reckoning in the view of the unanimous Michigan State board,” said Daniel Prywes, a litigation partner at Morris, Manning, & Martin in Washington, D.C.
This is not a case of a “better late than never” investigation, Prywes added, but rather a case of “better done right at last.”
The previous “failed investigations” included a 2014 probe of a complaint against Nassar headed by assistant general counsel Kristine Moore. That probe cleared the sports doctor of wrongdoing.
After Nassar's arrest, the board hired Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom to defend it and promised an internal investigation. But the law firm's findings were never made public.
Then, after Nassar's conviction, the state attorney general's office concluded its own investigation by indicting three school employees, including the former president for allegedly lying about when she knew of Nassar's misconduct. Her case is ongoing.
The state's investigation ended on a sour note when the school, which had vowed to cooperate, refused to waive attorney-client privilege over documents, and the prosecution lost its fight for the materials in court. Prywes said the dispute over documents has “clouded” the credibility of that investigation.
Demanding accountability, several survivors of the abuse continued to lobby the board to hire an independent investigator, even after the victims settled their claims for $500 million last year.
Laurel Gift, chair of the criminal defense and internal investigations practice at Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis in Pittsburgh, said Tuesday “it is never too late” for an independent investigation.
Gift said the “purpose is to be satisfied, especially in instances of sexual misconduct, that they have a factual understanding of who knew what and when, and how they responded. It's possible the trustees know the answers, but because of the [privileged] context of the prior review, they can't share it.”
So why not just waive its privilege over the previous investigative documents? Gift said it's essential that an investigator know up-front that their work will be publicly disclosed.
“It's very hard to conduct a confidential and privileged investigation and later try to move toward making it public,” she explained.
Gift added the school “really needs the results of an investigation that can be shared publicly in order for the community and the individuals to heal.”
Michigan State spokesperson Emily Guerrant said the trustees did not issue a formal statement after voting to approve the investigation. Guerrant said the law firm contract has not yet been finalized because the scope of work, time frame and costs are still being worked out.
Normally a general counsel would be involved in such details, but Michigan State fired its general counsel in February after one year on the job.
Guerrant explained, “An official search [for a new general counsel] is not happening. I think it's appropriate to say that the university is waiting until our new president is officially here and can have an opinion.”
The board has hired Samuel Stanley, a medical doctor and head of Stony Brook University in New York, as Michigan State's new leader. He begins Aug. 1.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute readFormer Rutgers Law School Dean Replaces Hoffman as University General Counsel on Interim Basis
4 minute readAs Student Workers Unionize in Droves, NLRB Tries to Prevent Colleges' Privacy Concerns From Slowing Momentum
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250