New Association of Corporate Counsel Benchmarking Report Lets Legal Departments Measure Up
In-house lawyers can compare their team's size and spend in a new report from the Association of Corporate Counsel.
June 25, 2019 at 06:40 PM
4 minute read
In-house counsel can see how their teams stack up in size, spend and service use in a report released Tuesday by the Association of Corporate Counsel.
The ACC teamed up with recruiting firm Major, Lindsey & Africa for its “2019 Global Legal Department Benchmarking Report,” which includes responses from over 500 companies in 31 countries.
Legal teams spanned 71 industries and ranged in size from one lawyer to more than 1,000. The median legal department had four lawyers, one paralegal and no legal operations professionals. Most legal teams accounted for a small percent of their company's total staff, accounting for 0.3% of employees.
Team size tends to increase with company revenue, the report found, with 8.7 lawyers for every $1 billion brought in.
Lawyers can be overly ambitious when it comes to cutting legal spend, according to the report. The media legal department budgeted just over $1.6 million for 2018 spend but spent $1.9 million. Respondents' average budget, which could be skewed by larger legal teams, was around $12.4 million while spend hit $16.6 million.
“One thing we see time and time again is that moving off of the billable hour generates better results,” said Catherine Moynihan, the ACC's associate vice president of legal management services, in an email. “For as much as we talk about value-based fees, two-thirds of in-house law departments still use hourly billing.”
Reducing legal spend was ranked as a key performance metric for departments, yet the average respondent gave their team 3.6 out of 5 satisfaction rating for efforts to cut costs.
Around half of that spend is going to internal legal costs, the report found, at the median and average level. Median in-house spend was nearly $850,000. That breaks down to $560,000 for lawyer compensation.
“Law departments consistently spend the most on labor/staffing—it's the brainpower to handle the legal matters facing the company,” Moynihan said. ”However, over the past few years, we've seen an overall trend towards insourcing, where law departments spend more on internal staff and resources rather than spending on outsourcing.”
The median cost of an in-house lawyer per hour was $90. Mining industry counsel earned the most at $123 per hour and wholesale trade lawyers earned the least in-house at $74.
Firms drew 90% of the remaining half of legal spend for the median department, though 5% is going to alternative legal service providers. Outside spend was 0.2% of total revenue for the median company.
The report also highlighted what work stayed in-house and what was sent to firms.
Almost all respondents' legal teams kept contract management internal, at 97%. This work was performed by lawyers, versus paralegals or legal ops, in more than 80% of respondents' departments. More than 40% of the teams have adopted contract management technology.
“Contracts are one of the areas of law where understanding the needs of the business is paramount,” Moynihan said. “In-house counsel are uniquely positioned to do this well, and best. Compared to outside providers, they are more integrated with the business clients.”
Document management, invoice review, legal operations and records management were also kept in-house for most departments. The matters most likely to be outsourced were litigation case management, litigation legal hold and legal research.
The median legal department used 10 firms, listing three “significant” firm relationships.
|
Stay on top of in-house developments with Inside Track, a weekly email briefing from Law.com. Sign up here
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHealth Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
How a 200,000-Worker Global Enterprise Took Down the Silos and Made ESG Its Mission
4 minute readCorporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
- 3Battle for Top Talent Accelerates Amid Profit and Demand Surge
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250