What Does 2019 Hold for Legal AI?
What developments can we expect in the next year? Where and in what new ways will AI tools be deployed?
June 27, 2019 at 01:34 PM
5 minute read
The last five years have seen an explosion in the legal technology market. Across a range of industries, we have arrived at a point where deploying artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly the norm, and law is no exception. The number of firms and in-house teams now operating with some form of assistive AI technology is at an all-time high and it's only continuing to rise. Just as accountants no longer imagine life without excel, lawyers will soon be unable to imagine their day-to-day without AI.
2019 will bring a shift in the questions that are asked: it is no longer a case of whether this technology is beneficial, but which AI solutions, of the many now available, can best meet requirements. The year ahead will be one of significant progress.
So, why is this? Firstly, the capabilities of AI have notably progressed. We have now arrived at the fourth tier of machine learning, where the machine is able to make informed suggestions based on lawyers' interactions with documents—this is a clear step forward from the rigid, rules-based functions of older legal AI tools. Machines' capabilities will continue to improve over the next year, and the support offered to legal teams will continue to increase in sophistication. This sophistication is already visible in our evolution from previous technology solutions which introduced risk and compromise in the name of efficiency, as lawyers are now able to work faster without the previous downsides. Lawyers' confidence has increased and they are able to be more rigorous in their review, rather than rely on outdated methods like sampling.
Secondly, law firms and in-house counsel are now less reticent towards AI technology than they were a year ago, and this opens up significant opportunity for progress. The term 'AI' no longer carries unclear and futuristic connotations; most households now interact with AI daily through smartphones and other connected devices. This wider use and acceptance has led to a shift in perception across the legal industry; lawyers are now more open than ever to trialling the technology in a bid to improve the services they deliver to clients.
Implementation of AI products is also becoming easier. Lengthy deployment and training periods, which previously plagued legacy technology, are no longer cause for concern. New-era tools are much easier to use and understand. They are user-friendly, integrated seamlessly and adapt as lawyers use them. With lawyers notoriously time-poor, this removes a huge barrier to adoption.
|Shifting Focus and Team Structure
All of these changes will have a notable impact on legal team structures, and the type of work both law firms and in-house lawyers carry out day-to-day. We will likely see a reduction in the size of teams allocated per project and a change to the overall focus of lawyers' work.
AI is also changing the type of work that lawyers are doing. Endless, mind-numbing and time-consuming tasks—such as due diligence and document review—take far less time with AI, or, in some cases, disappear completely. This means that junior lawyers and support staff, typically allocated such jobs, can now spend their time on more analytical and strategic work. This may mean fewer lawyers are needed per project or case, but it will have a positive impact on career progression and day-to-day experience.
We will also see wider changes in the legal market. The adoption of AI levels the playing field, opening up the market to smaller firms with fewer people, enabling them to bid for larger projects. So, to remain competitive in a crowded market, law firms and in-house counsel need to continue to view AI as an exciting enabler, rather than simply a box-ticking exercise. Staying ahead will be crucial.
However, we should remember that AI will never be able to compete with law firms or in-house counsel directly. It will never replace the years of expertise, experience and judgment of a lawyer. Technology should be seen to work seamlessly in tandem with the lawyers, surfacing relevant and pertinent information which the lawyer then decides to act on.
|Final Thoughts
Law firms and in-house teams need to look at AI as an opportunity. Now six months in, 2019 is carving itself out to be the legacy year in which the industry took real steps to fully modernize, embracing technology to boost efficiency.
Machine learning platforms such as Luminance allow lawyers to remain productive, profitable and above all, competitive. Now that we've moved past suspicion and fear, the opportunities for the legal sector are enormous.
Firms and in-house teams now need to think carefully about their strategy, and the internal infrastructure needed to support successful technological innovation. Budgets, team expertise, training and selection of the right products are all key considerations. The issue should be top of leaders' agendas as the year progresses.
Emily Foges is CEO of Luminance. She has been scaling up technology-led businesses for over 20 years, working in M&A as a consultant and in-house with some of the UK's fastest growing businesses. She specialized in building business cases and then leading integration, when companies come together to become greater than the sum of their parts. The complexity of combining customers, products, platforms, teams and operations was the ideal training ground for turning a technology start-up into a global organization. Emily became CEO in 2016 when Luminance was a small team of technologists and lawyers. She took the product to market and led the growth of the business, which doubled in size every quarter throughout last year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250