Cybersecurity Concerns Becoming a Bigger Part of M&A Due Diligence, Survey Shows
“I don't think only 50% of the companies that do M&A need to worry about this. I think 100% of the companies that do M&A need to worry about this,” said one source.
June 28, 2019 at 01:16 PM
5 minute read
Unreported data breaches have disrupted several major M&A deals in recent years, including Marriott International's merger with the Starwood hotel chain, TripAdvisor Inc.'s acquisition of Viator Inc., and the Verizon-Yahoo Inc. deal.
When the breaches came to light, they proved costly. Yahoo was devalued by more than $350 million and Verizon became embroiled in a massive class action suit. TripAdvisor shed $580 million in market capitalization. Marriott's stock took a big hit after the breach was disclosed and the company is still dealing with the fallout, which is believed to have exposed millions of unencrypted and encrypted passport numbers of hotel guests.
The growing list of cautionary tales appears to be making an impression. A new survey of 2,700 information technology professionals and business executives from around the world shows that 93% of respondents view cybersecurity evaluations as important to their company's M&A decision-making.
Participants in the study from Forescout Technologies Co. in San Jose, California, also ranked a target company's history of cybersecurity incidents as the second-most important factor when performing due diligence on the business. Unsurprisingly, the company's financial statements took top priority.
Slightly more than half of the participants reported that a “critical cybersecurity issue or incident” had jeopardized an M&A deal involving their companies.
“What I hope people wouldn't take away from this is that it's only half of the cases that run into an issue like this,” said Joseph Castelluccio, a partner in Mayer Brown's New York office and a member of the firm's corporate and securities practice.
“I don't think only 50% of the companies that do M&A need to worry about this,” he added. “I think 100% of the companies that do M&A need to worry about this.”
While cybersecurity is a concern, it often takes a back seat to other due diligence issues. Only 36% of respondents “strongly agree” that their IT teams are given sufficient time to review a target company's cybersecurity standards, according to the study.
“These acquisitions are announced after the deal is nearly completed. The IT and cybersecurity sides, unfortunately in a number of instances, are brought in after the financial and regulatory due diligence is done,” said Rocco Grillo, managing director of global cyber risk services at the New York consulting firm of Alvarez & Marsal.
“Companies are racing to be compliant, whether for business purposes or regulatory requirements. But make no mistake about it, compliance doesn't equal security,” Grillo said. He added that having strong cybersecurity protocols “comes back to the tone at the top, executive sponsorship” and giving IT professionals a seat at the table with business leaders.
When a company is considering acquiring a business that has unsophisticated or questionable data protection practices, it's best to approach the deal as if a breach has occurred and take precautionary measures until more thorough due diligence can be done, according to Castelluccio.
“That may mean not integrating systems right away,” he said.
Aside from preparing for potential hidden data privacy issues, companies also need to realize that their data is more vulnerable during the M&A process. As soon as the deal is announced, cyberattackers know that sensitive information is being transmitted between the companies. And a new group of employees and third parties will also have access to that data, increasing the risk for human error.
“This isn't just a technology or financial services issue. This is something that legal and compliance teams care about,” Castelluccio said. “Frankly, there are few things that will land you on the front page of the newspaper or going viral across Twitter than your company being the latest victim of something like this.”
Other findings from the report include:
- 81% of respondents said they were more concerned about a target company's cybersecurity practices than they had been in the past.
- 73% said uncovering a previously undisclosed data breach during the M&A process would be an “immediate deal breaker.”
- 65% said unforeseen cybersecurity issues had caused their companies to have buyer's remorse in the wake of an acquisition.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readEx-Red Robin CLO Joins Norton Rose Fulbright After Helping Sell Latest Employer for $4.9 Billion
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250