Cybersecurity Concerns Becoming a Bigger Part of M&A Due Diligence, Survey Shows
“I don't think only 50% of the companies that do M&A need to worry about this. I think 100% of the companies that do M&A need to worry about this,” said one source.
June 28, 2019 at 01:16 PM
5 minute read
Unreported data breaches have disrupted several major M&A deals in recent years, including Marriott International's merger with the Starwood hotel chain, TripAdvisor Inc.'s acquisition of Viator Inc., and the Verizon-Yahoo Inc. deal.
When the breaches came to light, they proved costly. Yahoo was devalued by more than $350 million and Verizon became embroiled in a massive class action suit. TripAdvisor shed $580 million in market capitalization. Marriott's stock took a big hit after the breach was disclosed and the company is still dealing with the fallout, which is believed to have exposed millions of unencrypted and encrypted passport numbers of hotel guests.
The growing list of cautionary tales appears to be making an impression. A new survey of 2,700 information technology professionals and business executives from around the world shows that 93% of respondents view cybersecurity evaluations as important to their company's M&A decision-making.
Participants in the study from Forescout Technologies Co. in San Jose, California, also ranked a target company's history of cybersecurity incidents as the second-most important factor when performing due diligence on the business. Unsurprisingly, the company's financial statements took top priority.
Slightly more than half of the participants reported that a “critical cybersecurity issue or incident” had jeopardized an M&A deal involving their companies.
“What I hope people wouldn't take away from this is that it's only half of the cases that run into an issue like this,” said Joseph Castelluccio, a partner in Mayer Brown's New York office and a member of the firm's corporate and securities practice.
“I don't think only 50% of the companies that do M&A need to worry about this,” he added. “I think 100% of the companies that do M&A need to worry about this.”
While cybersecurity is a concern, it often takes a back seat to other due diligence issues. Only 36% of respondents “strongly agree” that their IT teams are given sufficient time to review a target company's cybersecurity standards, according to the study.
“These acquisitions are announced after the deal is nearly completed. The IT and cybersecurity sides, unfortunately in a number of instances, are brought in after the financial and regulatory due diligence is done,” said Rocco Grillo, managing director of global cyber risk services at the New York consulting firm of Alvarez & Marsal.
“Companies are racing to be compliant, whether for business purposes or regulatory requirements. But make no mistake about it, compliance doesn't equal security,” Grillo said. He added that having strong cybersecurity protocols “comes back to the tone at the top, executive sponsorship” and giving IT professionals a seat at the table with business leaders.
When a company is considering acquiring a business that has unsophisticated or questionable data protection practices, it's best to approach the deal as if a breach has occurred and take precautionary measures until more thorough due diligence can be done, according to Castelluccio.
“That may mean not integrating systems right away,” he said.
Aside from preparing for potential hidden data privacy issues, companies also need to realize that their data is more vulnerable during the M&A process. As soon as the deal is announced, cyberattackers know that sensitive information is being transmitted between the companies. And a new group of employees and third parties will also have access to that data, increasing the risk for human error.
“This isn't just a technology or financial services issue. This is something that legal and compliance teams care about,” Castelluccio said. “Frankly, there are few things that will land you on the front page of the newspaper or going viral across Twitter than your company being the latest victim of something like this.”
Other findings from the report include:
- 81% of respondents said they were more concerned about a target company's cybersecurity practices than they had been in the past.
- 73% said uncovering a previously undisclosed data breach during the M&A process would be an “immediate deal breaker.”
- 65% said unforeseen cybersecurity issues had caused their companies to have buyer's remorse in the wake of an acquisition.
Read More:
Cyber Due Diligence Is Table Stakes for Effective M&A
The Brave New World of Cybersecurity in M&A Due Diligence: Pitfalls and Opportunities
New Yahoo Data Breach Settlement Filed, Boosting Its Value to $117.5M
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Ordered to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute readApple GC’s Compensation Flat Again in 2024, but She Might Snag No. 1 Spot on Top-Paid List Anyway
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250