Michael J. Harrington, senior vice president and general counsel with Eli Lilly and Co. Courtesy photo.Eli Lilly General Counsel to Retire
The pharmaceutical company's current general counsel and vice president, Mike Harrington, is preparing to retire at the end of the year.
July 11, 2019 at 01:19 PM
2 minute read
Eli Lilly and Co. is on the hunt for a new top lawyer as its current general counsel and vice president, Mike Harrington, is preparing to retire at the end of the year.
The global pharmaceutical company announced Harrington's plans to step down on Thursday and stated that a ”search is underway for Harrington's successor.”
Harrington joined Lilly in 1991 as a product liability litigation lawyer and has been a member of the Indianapolis-based company's executive committee for seven years.
He has served several roles at the company, including managing director of Lilly's New Zealand affiliate and associate general counsel for Lilly's operations in the Asia-Pacific region. Before he was promoted to GC, he served as deputy general counsel of global pharmaceutical operations and oversaw legal matters for Lilly's global business branches.
Lilly chairman and CEO David Ricks credited Harrington with helping the company maintain “patent exclusivity for a number of important medicines” and finalizing several acquisitions, including Loxo Oncology and ARMO BioSciences.
“But his impact goes far beyond the legal department,” Ricks added. “Mike models the Lilly values, has developed and mentored talent throughout the organization and served as a key adviser to Lilly's board and two CEOs.”
Harrington, who was unavailable for comment, was a litigator at Baker & Daniels in Indianapolis before he went to work for Lilly. He has a bachelor's degree in English from Albion College in Michigan and a law degree from the Columbia University School of Law.
Meanwhile, another Lilly executive, Christi Shaw, senior vice president and president of Lilly Bio-Medicines, is retiring at the end of August. The president and general manager of Lilly Japan, Patrik Jonsson, has been named as Shaw's successor.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Sage Therapeutics Axes GC After Drug-Pipeline Failures Force Cost-Cutting
After Guiding Illumina Through Harrowing Merger Fight, GC Charles Dadswell to Depart
Former CVS Exec Faces Trade Secrets Suit for Allegedly Helping Chickasaw Nation Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
