Justice Department, 6 Whistleblowers Win $1.4B Settlement With Opioid Maker
The U.S. Department of Justice said the Reckitt Benckiser Group also entered a nonprosecution agreement to resolve potential criminal charges. The settlement included the U.K.-based group and its subsidiary in New Jersey, Reckitt Benckiser LLC.
July 11, 2019 at 05:45 PM
4 minute read
Six whistleblowers scored a major victory Thursday when the global consumer goods conglomerate Reckitt Benckiser Group announced a record $1.4 billion civil settlement with the federal government over sales and marketing of the opioid Suboxone.
The U.S. Department of Justice said the RB Group also entered a nonprosecution agreement to resolve potential criminal charges. The settlement included the U.K.-based group and its subsidiary in New Jersey, Reckitt Benckiser LLC.
In a statement, the company said, “While [the RB Group] has acted lawfully at all times and expressly denies all allegations that it engaged in any wrongful conduct, after careful consideration, the Board of RB determined that the agreement is in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.”
The company did not respond to a request for comment, but its statement continued, “This is a non-criminal resolution and is on the basis that there is no admission of any violation of law or any wrongdoing by RB or any RB Group employee.”
Rupert Bondy, general counsel of the RB Group, signed the settlement agreement for his company, and then signed a second time representing the New Jersey subsidiary. He could not be reached for comment.
Federal prosecutors said until 2014 the RB Group wholly owned a pharmaceutical subsidiary now known as Indivior Inc. that sold Suboxone throughout the U.S. The whistleblowers filed their qui tam suits in 2013, and the RB Group spun off Indivior the next year and is no longer affiliated with it.
Indivior was indicted in April for allegedly engaging in an illicit nationwide scheme to increase prescriptions of Suboxone through falsely marketing it as safer than similar drugs, and by engaging in anti-competitive behavior to delay a generic version. The drug is used by recovering opioid addicts to avoid or reduce withdrawal symptoms while they undergo treatment.
The indictment also alleged that Indivior touted its “Here to Help” internet and telephone program as a resource for opioid-addicted patients. Instead, according to the indictment, Indivior used the program to connect patients to doctors it knew were prescribing Suboxone and other opioids to more patients than allowed by federal law.
Indivior's criminal trial is scheduled to begin May 11, 2020, in U.S. district court in Abingdon, Virginia.
Kenneth Yoffy, counsel for one of the whistleblowers, told Corporate Counsel, “it's not over yet. Our qui tam suit against Indivior is still pending.”
Yoffy praised his client, Ann Marie Williams, as “an incredibly courageous person, as were the other five whistleblowers, for exposing what the company was doing. Whenever you file a qui tam action, your life becomes disrupted, and this case has been going on for six years.”
Scott Simmer, partner at Baron & Budd in Washington, D.C., represented a second whistleblower, Gail Scott. Simmer said in a statement, “I am very proud of the courage of our client who came forward with critical information of [the RB Group's] conduct. She put her career on the line to do what's right.”
Simmer continued, “Today's settlement represents a small step in the right direction towards holding opioid manufacturers responsible for their role in creating a public health crisis that continues to plague our country.”
The six whistleblowers will be able to share from 15% to 25% of Thursday's civil settlement, with more possible from the Indivior case. The exact amount has not yet been determined.
There have been larger settlements with non-opioid drug makers, including a $3 billion deal with GlaxoSmithKline in 2012. But DOJ said the RB Group settlement was the largest ever with an opioid company.
The recovery includes the forfeiture of proceeds totaling $647 million, civil settlements with the federal government and the states totaling $700 million, and an administrative resolution with the Federal Trade Commission for $50 million.
In addition to the payments, the RB Group agreed not to manufacture or market controlled substances in the United States for three years, and to cooperate fully with all DOJ investigations and prosecutions related to Suboxone.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Launches Inquiry of Single-Family Rental Home 'Mega Investors,' Issues PBM Report
5 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bass Berry & Sims Relocates to Nashville Office Designed to Encourage Collaboration, Inclusion
- 2Legaltech Rundown: McDermott Will & Emery Invests $10 Million in The LegalTech Fund, LexisNexis Releases Conversational Search for Nexis+ AI, and More
- 3The TikTokification of the Courtroom
- 4New Jersey’s Arbitration Appeal Deadline—A Call for Clarity
- 5Law Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250