Manatt Touts New Cannabis Practice as Firms Vie to Ride Green Wave
Manatt joins a growing list of major U.S. law firms that have announced specialized cannabis practices.
July 15, 2019 at 08:22 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips has become the latest Big Law firm to publicly join the green rush, announcing Monday that it has formally launched a cannabis-focused practice team.
The 45-member group, spanning a dozen practice areas, will be led by Los Angeles-based real estate partner Anita Sabine.
Sabine said the firm has represented clients in the cannabis space for nearly a decade, but the recent hire of former financial regulator Jan Owen helped spur the announcement of the group's formation. Owen, who will serve as senior adviser to the firm's financial services group, worked on cannabis banking issues as the former commissioner of the California Department of Business Oversight.
"It makes sense to say, 'Hey, this is the time to formally launch this and let everybody know this is who we are and this is what we've been doing,'" Sabine said. "And we're going to continue to do it."
Manatt joins a growing list of major U.S. law firms, including Davis Wright Tremaine, Duane Morris, and Baker Botts, that have launched specialized cannabis practices, expanded their existing work in the space or at least acknowledged consulting and advising clients in the still federally illegal industry. Last month, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton said it was assigning 70 lawyers across 12 of the firm's offices to create a cannabis practice. A San Diego-based real estate partner will lead the team.
Several Manatt lawyers this week will participate in a webinar focused on banking and cannabis, and the firm has regularly posted advisories about big developments in the legal space, but Manatt has not done higher-profile event sponsorships and its attorneys are not regular speakers at industry conferences. Sabine said it was never the firm's intention to keep a low profile on its cannabis-related work, which started on a small scale.
"Really at the time we embarked on this practice, it was in its infancy. We've seen a lot of changes over the decade," she said.
Worldwide spending on legal cannabis is expected to reach $16.9 billion this year, according to Arcview Market Research. The U.S. market alone for hemp-derived CBD, the non-mind-altering compound making its way into everything from salves to dog treats, could hit $22 billion by 2022, according to an estimate by the Brightfield Group.
Sabine declined to identify Manatt's cannabis and CBD clients but she said the related work crossed many of the firm's practices and included real estate financing deals, cross-border mergers and acquisitions, equity investments, regulatory compliance, intellectual property, marketing and advertising advice and celebrity licensing.
➤➤ Get the latest cannabis lawyering, compliance and commentary straight to your inbox with Higher Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
Given marijuana's Schedule 1 classification by the federal government, some big firms have chosen not to work with state-legal cannabis businesses. Others work only with ancillary businesses or in operations based in Canada, where marijuana is legal on the federal level.
Manatt has no dark-line rules against taking on particular clients or areas of work, Sabine said, and the firm serves both plant-touching cannabis operators and companies that do business with them.
"We underwrite our clients. We know who we're doing business with and we work within the law," she said. "So there's no subject matters or types of clients that are off limits for us. It's just a matter of making sure that your client is the type of client you want to work with."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
FTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Discover Hires Interim Legal Chief as $35B Sale to Capital One Faces New Hurdles
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250