Automation for In-House Teams: Three Key Workflows for Rapid Results
Using automation to improve these three workflows will deliver quantifiable benefits and help the corporate legal team align more closely with the goals of the business.
July 16, 2019 at 02:21 PM
8 minute read
Time is scarce and workloads are heavy for today's corporate legal teams. In-house lawyers are increasingly focused on making significant contributions to the key goals of the business and showing their value to stakeholders. In order to do this, corporate legal departments are bringing more work in-house, offering real-time reporting and delivering insights to help the business meet their goals.
Even as they are asked to contribute more strategic advice, general counsel must still serve the day-to-day needs of the business, including handling business transactions, analyzing and managing risk, ensuring regulatory compliance and more.
As a result of these growing demands, GCs often find themselves with more tasks than time and must carefully manage their workloads. With expectations and responsibilities higher than ever, corporate legal teams are turning to technology to find new, modern ways to manage their workloads.
Automation to the Rescue
Automation has the potential to be one of the most effective ways for corporate lawyers to free themselves from lower-value, monotonous tasks and dedicate their time to larger strategic goals and business initiatives. Automation is the triple threat of legal operations. Not only does workflow automation save time, it also reduces risk by improving consistency and builds a foundation for better data capture leading to more reliable future insights.
Legal workflow automation isn't just for big businesses and huge law firms anymore. Cloud-based workflow automation solutions are increasingly affordable and easy to access. Legal teams that don't take advantage of these tools risk being left behind as the speed of business shows no signs of slowing down.
Ready or not, it's time to start automating—here's where you should start to maximize buy in from your business and see rapid results.
Self-Service Document Generation
Corporate legal departments generate a staggering number of documents and spend an enormous amount of time drafting them, but many of these documents are routine and require very little specialized legal input.
The list of these time-consuming documents includes employment contracts, supply and sales agreements, NDAs and more. While these contracts and agreements are critical to the business, they can be time consuming and monotonous for the legal department.
With workflow and document automation, much of this process can be completed by the business user with a few clicks of the mouse. The user selects their desired document and, using an easy form, completes the required information like party names and dates. The information is then matched to the appropriate fields in the document templates provided by the legal department. The document is then generated and delivered as requested with all the preapproved and up-to-date language defined by the legal team.
But the benefits don't end there; automated documents can be controlled through a document management solution integrated with an e-signature service which guarantees that you never miss a step in your workflow. Once a document is completed and signed it can be further managed so that document metadata is retained for easy access, and renewal reminders trigger upon selected dates.
Worried business users will get lost or confused by the process? Not to fear, self-service doesn't mean they're flying solo. Detailed instructions can be built into the forms to help answer common questions and guide users through the process. In addition, the legal department can determine, based on the user's responses, which documents will require further review, more information or escalation. The self-service system can then trigger the next step in the workflow to create a task and notify the appropriate legal team member of the additional review required.
In addition to the efficiency benefits to both in-house lawyers and business users, improved consistency in these routine contracts protects the business from risk while the data submitted by the business user can be leveraged for future insights, tracking and more.
Automated Legal Matter Intake
Legal matter intake can be a mess. In-house lawyers field requests that can take many forms from a variety of departments. Depending on the maturity of the intake process, GCs may receive legal requests in person, sent in an email or dropped by in person. Without a clearly defined (and enforced) process, it's unlikely that the request was conveniently accompanied by all the information required to move forward.
With automation, you can standardize and optimize this process to ensure that every matter is submitted with all the right information, every time. Imagine how much time could be saved when the involved parties don't have to be tracked down and followed up with for omitted information.
Simplifying the matter intake workflow begins with a matter intake form, completed by the business stakeholder and includes questions to prompt the user to submit all the necessary data and documents.
Once submitted, the matter intake workflow is triggered and the responses determine which associate is notified of the incoming request. The associate then approves the instruction and the system sends a confirmation email to the business user while at the same time creating necessary documentation. Simultaneously notifications, calendar events and tasks are sent to the right people with instructions on how to process the request.
Traditionally, business stakeholders would need to inquire with the legal department directly to find out the status of their matter. The legal team would then compile an update and email the information to the inquiring parties. However, with an automated legal matter intake solution, business stakeholders can view the progress of their matter in real-time.
Additionally, the legal team can use data visualizations drawn from their matter intake data. Visualizing this data helps the legal team determine which business departments are submitting matters, which matter types are in progress and the speed at which matters are being processed. From these visualizations, the legal department can quickly evaluate team and individual workloads and adjust where needed to ensure staff utilization is optimized.
Approval Workflow Automation
At any given time the corporate legal department is tracking matter progress, external counsel and vendor invoices, deadlines, contracts and more. These documents create a web of people, tasks and due dates that can halt progress if not managed and tracked properly.
Some corporate legal departments spend hours manually updating Excel spreadsheets in an attempt to stay up to date. Inconsistent updating and human error can cause delays and open the business up to risk.
Automating the approval workflow means that the correct process is followed every time, current documents are available to all involved parties and legal matter progress is transparent. Bottlenecks can quickly be identified and addressed. Responsive task templates mean your team will won't lose track of where they are in the process and nothing will fall through the cracks.
A really simple way of handling approval workflows is by using the Kanban method—this enables easy progression through the process and visibility of all the work. The Kanban board represents the sequential steps required to handle the approval workflow, while a task represents the individual item to be approved.
- For example, a contract is submitted for review. The submission triggers the automated creation of a task that is then assigned to the relevant legal team member
- That team member completes their step which automatically moves the task along to the next step and person in the workflow
- As tasks are moved along the Kanban board they are automatically reassigned to the relevant person until the workflow is complete
- All tasks are clearly visible on the Kanban board while data visualizations on a dashboard are used to represent scale, performance and work in progress
A more efficient approval process can create a quicker route to revenue. In one case, using technology for an approval workflow reduced legal contract processing timeline by 65 percent, resulting in an accelerated sales cycle and value for the business.
Using automation to improve these three workflows will deliver quantifiable benefits and help the corporate legal team align more closely with the goals of the business. Automation ensures that the right people have the right information at the right time and helps GC's and in-house legal teams stay focused on higher-value work.
Tom MacDonald is responsible for the Project and Process use cases at HighQ. He has over 10 years of experience working in legal publishing and software development, most recently working at LexisNexis as Product Owner for Workflows. Tom is a qualified Scrum Master and Prince2 Practitioner and has a degree in English Literature.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![AI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings AI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c5/c5/75ff44a9441ba48050d3241762df/lawtech-767x633.jpg)
AI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute read![A Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs A Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2024/11/Legal-Tools1-767x633-2.jpg)
A Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute read![Election Risk Preparedness: Are General Counsel Ready? (Part 2) Election Risk Preparedness: Are General Counsel Ready? (Part 2)](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2024/10/Divided-Americans-767x633-2.jpg)
![Three Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity Three Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2024/10/Teamwork-767x633-1.jpg)
Three Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250