Microsoft to Pay $25M to Settle FCPA Claims Over Alleged Bribery in Hungary
“We recognize that no business process can offer a perfect guarantee of eliminating all global instances of a human frailty that is as old as humanity itself," Microsoft Corp. president Brad Smith told employees in an email.
July 22, 2019 at 01:10 PM
4 minute read
“Deeply disappointed and embarrassed.”
That's how Microsoft Corp. president and chief legal officer Brad Smith said he and fellow company leaders felt after learning that senior executives and other employees of the tech giant's Hungarian subsidiary were involved in an alleged bribery scheme.
“As a company, we do not tolerate employees and partners who willfully break policies that go to fundamental issues of business and integrity,” Smith added in an email to employees.
The bribery revelation, which occurred several years ago, resulted in Microsoft entering into a more than $25.3 million settlement agreement Monday with the Justice Department and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to settle claims of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Under the agreement, Microsoft will pay more than $8.7 million in criminal penalties and $16.5 million to the SEC in disgorgement and prejudgment interest. The company also has entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the DOJ and a cease and desist order with the SEC.
According to the DOJ, Microsoft's employees in Hungary “falsely represented to Microsoft” that they were giving Hungarian government agencies steep discounts on software licenses to finalize deals with resellers who bid to sell those licenses to government customers.
In reality, the discounts allegedly were not passed on to government customers but were instead “used for corrupt purposes.”
Microsoft employees in Saudi Arabia, Thailand and Turkey also engaged in misconduct, according to the SEC's cease and desist order. In Saudi Arabia, for example, employees allegedly used at least $440,000 in company money to pay for travel expenses for government employees and buy government agencies gifts, including laptops and furniture.
But “the most concerning conduct took place” in Hungary, according to Smith. The DOJ alleged that the bribery scheme in that country resulted in Microsoft obtaining nearly $14 million in business between 2013 and 2015.
Microsoft foreshadowed its FCPA settlement earlier this year when it stated in a quarterly report that it had “been cooperating with authorities in the U.S. in connection with reports concerning our compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in various countries.”
The DOJ reduced Microsoft's criminal penalty by 25% based on the company's “full cooperation and remediation.” While Microsoft did not voluntarily self-disclose the misconduct, it fired the Hungarian employees in question and enacted a more robust, companywide compliance system to mitigate corruption risks.
Smith told employees that Microsoft had created a discount transparency program for public sector sales, strengthened the company's anti-corruption program and was using machine learning to flag potentially corrupt transactions.
“We recognize that no business process can offer a perfect guarantee of eliminating all global instances of a human frailty that is as old as humanity itself. That's why we need strong laws and effective enforcement by agencies such as the DOJ and the SEC in the United States and around the world,” Smith wrote.
“And it's why across the business community we need not only to be vigilant but committed to putting the world's most advanced technology to work to help fulfill the strong ethical principles that the public rightfully expects us to uphold,” he added.
When contacted for Microsoft's comment on the FCPA settlement, a spokeswoman for the company referred to Smith's email to employees.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250