Microsoft Aims to Speed Up Data Sharing With Public Agreement Templates
Microsoft's legal team has released standardized data sharing agreement drafts, an effort to streamline the process and encourage data collaboration.
July 23, 2019 at 05:38 PM
3 minute read
Microsoft Corp.'s legal team took another step toward increasing cross-industry collaboration Tuesday, releasing data sharing agreement templates to make the process less burdensome.
Lack of a standardized agreement process is one of the “barriers to sharing data” preventing researchers from accessing the wide pool of data they need to build new artificial intelligence tools, a Microsoft representative said Tuesday. Erich Andersen, the Redmond, Washington-based tech company's chief intellectual property counsel, said in an email that it's taken some organizations up to a year to negotiate data sharing agreements.
“Our new agreements are intended to streamline and standardize that process so it's easier for companies to enter into data sharing agreements and more easily unlock the power of their data,” he said.
Andersen shared drafts for an open use of data agreement, computational use of data agreement, and a data use agreement for open AI model development in a LinkedIn post Tuesday.
The drafts address “common data-sharing scenarios,” respectively: one party openly distributing data it owns to a large group; one party openly distributing data based on public information to a large group; and one party sharing private data to another party for the purpose of training artificial intelligence.
Andersen said in an email that the first two agreements “will be able to be used without modification” in some instances, saving time and resources, while the third will still “require some customization for use.”
The legal team will also “build-out additional data sharing agreement templates” in the future, according to Microsoft's website. There are also plans to update the drafts released Tuesday in October after a period of ”community review and input.”
“We are hoping to work very broadly across tech, developers, researchers, academia and business in general to make sure these agreements work as widely as possible,” Andersen said.
Microsoft's call for more data sharing is its legal department's latest push for more external collaboration.
In March, chief legal officer and president Brad Smith called for companies to “work together across the tech sector” to stop the spread of hateful and violent content online, after a video of a shooting at two New Zealand mosques rapidly spread across platforms.
Smith also announced an official collaboration program, Microsoft's Shared Innovation Initiative, in April 2018. The initiative aims to promote collaboration by allowing nontech companies that invent using with Microsoft consultants, engineers or software ownership of patents produced.
“The co-creation of new technology in the world today seldom starts from scratch,” Smith said in a post announcing the launch last year.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250