Complying With COPPA: Privacy Lawyers Share Strategies as FTC Strengthens Enforcement
Even if a site is open to all audiences, such as YouTube or TikTok, lawyers say features like bright colors or emojis could lead the FTC to classify it as a platform appealing to children.
July 25, 2019 at 06:42 PM
3 minute read
Google subsidiary YouTube is the latest general audience site to face mass fines over Children's Online Privacy Protection Act violations, according to reports this week, a sign general counsel may want to rethink their compliance approach.
Alphabet Inc.'s Google settlement comes just months after the Federal Trade Commission slapped another general audience site, TikTok, with a record-setting $5.7 million COPPA violation fine. Tyler Newby, co-chair of Fenwick & West's privacy and cybersecurity practice group, said the TikTok fine marked “a shift in how the FTC approaches COPPA enforcement.”
Michelle Cohen, a member attorney at Ifrah Law, said many companies used to safely assume that if their site wasn't targeted at children under 13, they weren't liable under COPPA. But that's no longer the case.
Even if a site is open to all audiences, such as YouTube or TikTok, the lawyers said features like bright colors or emojis could lead the FTC to classify it as a platform appealing to children.
“I think having some mechanisms is certainly better from a regulatory, compliance [and] defense perspective than just saying, 'Well, our website is not designed for kids and so we're not responsible for COPPA,'” Cohen said.
Those defense mechanisms could differ for each company, the lawyers said. A good first step is figuring out whether a platform truly is general audience, or whether aspects of the site target young children.
Newby said it should be easy for users to submit notices flagging concerns about children on the platform. Offering a contact point shows sites are making an effort, Cohen said. And if notices are flooding in, or are reporting similar parts of the site repeatedly, those concerns should be brought to legal.
“If you receive a lot of notices that many users, thousands of users, are under 13, then you can't really just treat those as individual one-offs,” Newby said. “You need to reassess whether you are in fact a general audience site or whether you're directed to children under 13.”
If parts of the site are likely to attract young children, Newby said general counsel may consider putting an age gate for that content that would block user data collection or prompt verifiable consent questions in compliance with COPPA.
And make sure data collection is actually altered for children under 13. Newby said he's seen companies fined for “self-inflicted” issues more than once, establishing age gates to weed out young children but forgetting to change data collection processes.
Companies can also double-check users' ages as they sign up for the site. Cohen suggested platforms prompt users to input their birthdays or ages more than once, to catch children who may be using a fake date to access the site.
“You can't turn a blind eye,” Cohen said. “You can't watch everything, but you also can't say, 'Oh, I'm this general website,' when some of your biggest [users] are young kids.”
Read More:
Keeping Up With the Tech: Behind the FTC's COPPA Review
FTC Hits Musical.ly With Record-Setting $5.7M Fine Over COPPA Violations
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
5 minute readGlobal Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Meta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Trending Stories
- 1In Novel Oil and Gas Feud, 5th Circuit Gives Choice of Arbitration Venue
- 2Jury Seated in Glynn County Trial of Ex-Prosecutor Accused of Shielding Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 3Ex-Archegos CFO Gets 8-Year Prison Sentence for Fraud Scheme
- 4Judges Split Over Whether Indigent Prisoners Bringing Suit Must Each Pay Filing Fee
- 5Law Firms Report Wide Growth, Successful Billing Rate Increases and Less Merger Interest
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250