Sites With 'Like' Button Embeds Are Liable for User Data Sent to Facebook, EU Court Rules
Websites with an embedded Facebook "like" button, a tool often used to promote businesses on social media, will now be considered joint controllers with Facebook over the user data its plugin sends to the social media giant.
July 29, 2019 at 03:38 PM
3 minute read
Websites with embedded Facebook “like” buttons must inform users their data will be collected and processed by the social media giant, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled Monday.
Many sites—including German online clothing retailer Fashion ID, the focus of Monday's ruling—use Facebook's embedded “like” button as a tool to promote their business, allowing users to easily share site reviews or items for sale on social media.
But the button also sends users' personal data to Facebook “without that visitor being aware of it,” the court said. Data was allegedly collected and transmitted from site users who did not use Facebook or click the “like” button.
The court said Fashion ID and other sites “can be considered to be a controller jointly with Facebook Ireland” over the initial data collected from users on their site sent to Facebook because both parties determine “jointly the means and purposes” of that data collection.
Data controllers violating the EU's General Data Protection Regulation could face fines up to 20 million euros or 4% of annual global turnover, “whichever is greater.” Sites are not liable for what Facebook does with the data after it is consensually collected from their users.
To comply with GDPR, sites with a “like” button embed must now provide “at the time of [users' personal data] collection, certain information to those visitors such as, for example, its identity and the purposes of the processing.”
The processing and transmission of personal data through Facebook embeds “can be considered lawful” if sites prove legitimate interest or obtain user consent, which under GDPR must be “freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous.”
Sites that don't feature Facebook's “like” button could still be impacted by Monday's decision, which may apply to plugins leading to other social media sites, such as Twitter or Pinterest.
But of all the U.S.-based social media platforms, Facebook's business has drawn the most ire from European regulators. The company is currently under investigation from the Irish Data Protection Commission over potential GDPR violations and faces an antitrust probe from the European Commission.
In a statement Monday, Facebook associate general counsel Jack Gilbert said website plugins, such as the “like” button, are “common and important features of the modern Internet.”
“We welcome the clarity that today's decision brings to both websites and providers of plugins and similar tools,” Gilbert said. “We are carefully reviewing the court's decision and will work closely with our partners to ensure they can continue to benefit from our social plugins and other business tools in full compliance with the law.”
Fashion ID did not immediately respond to request for comment.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh & McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250