Sites With 'Like' Button Embeds Are Liable for User Data Sent to Facebook, EU Court Rules
Websites with an embedded Facebook "like" button, a tool often used to promote businesses on social media, will now be considered joint controllers with Facebook over the user data its plugin sends to the social media giant.
July 29, 2019 at 03:38 PM
3 minute read
Websites with embedded Facebook “like” buttons must inform users their data will be collected and processed by the social media giant, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled Monday.
Many sites—including German online clothing retailer Fashion ID, the focus of Monday's ruling—use Facebook's embedded “like” button as a tool to promote their business, allowing users to easily share site reviews or items for sale on social media.
But the button also sends users' personal data to Facebook “without that visitor being aware of it,” the court said. Data was allegedly collected and transmitted from site users who did not use Facebook or click the “like” button.
The court said Fashion ID and other sites “can be considered to be a controller jointly with Facebook Ireland” over the initial data collected from users on their site sent to Facebook because both parties determine “jointly the means and purposes” of that data collection.
Data controllers violating the EU's General Data Protection Regulation could face fines up to 20 million euros or 4% of annual global turnover, “whichever is greater.” Sites are not liable for what Facebook does with the data after it is consensually collected from their users.
To comply with GDPR, sites with a “like” button embed must now provide “at the time of [users' personal data] collection, certain information to those visitors such as, for example, its identity and the purposes of the processing.”
The processing and transmission of personal data through Facebook embeds “can be considered lawful” if sites prove legitimate interest or obtain user consent, which under GDPR must be “freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous.”
Sites that don't feature Facebook's “like” button could still be impacted by Monday's decision, which may apply to plugins leading to other social media sites, such as Twitter or Pinterest.
But of all the U.S.-based social media platforms, Facebook's business has drawn the most ire from European regulators. The company is currently under investigation from the Irish Data Protection Commission over potential GDPR violations and faces an antitrust probe from the European Commission.
In a statement Monday, Facebook associate general counsel Jack Gilbert said website plugins, such as the “like” button, are “common and important features of the modern Internet.”
“We welcome the clarity that today's decision brings to both websites and providers of plugins and similar tools,” Gilbert said. “We are carefully reviewing the court's decision and will work closely with our partners to ensure they can continue to benefit from our social plugins and other business tools in full compliance with the law.”
Fashion ID did not immediately respond to request for comment.
Read More:
GDPR Gets Early Test With Ireland's New Probe Into Facebook's Big Breach
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250