Law Firm Staff Can Now Apply to CLOC
The Corporate Legal Operations Consortium opened up applications for legal ops professionals at firms this week. Law firm members will belong to a separate CLOC community than legal department members, though in-house professionals can opt in to collaborate with firms.
July 30, 2019 at 03:14 PM
3 minute read
The largest U.S. legal operations networking group is officially opening up to firms.
The Corporate Legal Operations Consortium announced Tuesday that law firm staff who “devote the majority of their focus to legal operations or business management” can now apply to join its new Law Firm Community. Individual memberships start at $195 or $1,750 for up to 10 people from the same law firm.
CLOC board member and Gap Inc. head of legal ops Mike Haven said the new community and membership option is a response to firms “asking for a seat at the table and to be a part of the conversation in driving change in legal operations.”
Law firm members won't be able to access CLOC's in-house forums, an attempt at preventing the group from becoming a networking site for outside counsel. They'll instead access a separate CLOC site dedicated to law firm legal ops professionals.
But in-house counsel can still weigh in on firm questions, CLOC said in a press release, especially on “overlapping issues such as diversity and inclusion, billing.”
CLOC president Mary O'Carroll said in-house CLOC members can opt in to participate in the law firm community, for no added cost. In a small pilot of the CLOC law firm community more than 30 in-house professionals chose to participate, she said, with around 40 law firm members.
Since membership applications opened up publicly Monday, she said CLOC has seen “a lot of people opting in.” The group now has 170 participants, “roughly half firm and half in-house.”
“People will be curious to see what's happening at law firms and ask them questions and be part of that conversation. That's what we're trying to encourage,” said O'Carroll, who also serves as head of legal ops for Alphabet Inc.'s Google. “Because we don't want to just create this for law firms to talk to each other. The whole point is to engage across the divide.”
Legal service professionals are not eligible to join the firm community. O'Carroll said CLOC wanted to take membership option growth “one step at a time” and the divide between firms and legal departments seemed more urgent.
O'Carroll initially announced CLOC's plan to offer membership to some law firm professionals at the group's annual Las Vegas institute in May, though she did not share specifics at that time.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
InCloudCounsel Hires First GC to Continue Expansion in Asia
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250