Cisco Chief Legal Officer Says $8.6M Settlement Over Security Flaws Signals 'Changed Environment'
Cisco chief legal officer Mark Chandler said the company's $8.6 million settlement of a security flaws whistleblower case where there is "no evidence that any customer’s security was ever breached" is a sign "standards by which suppliers are judged are ... changing."
August 01, 2019 at 01:11 PM
3 minute read
The top lawyer at Cisco Systems Inc. said Wednesday the company’s $8.6 million settlement over alleged security flaws marks a “new environment” and heightened standards for software providers.
The qui tam case brought against Cisco, settled Wednesday, alleged the company failed to disclose possible security flaws in video surveillance software it sold to various U.S. government entities from 2008 to 2014. Plaintiff James Glenn, a former Denmark-based employee of Cisco partner company NetDesign, allegedly alerted Cisco to security flaws in 2008.
He alleged the flaws could allow hackers to access passwords and stored data and delete video feeds. A Cisco representative said there has been ”no allegation or evidence that any unauthorized access to customers’ video occurred as a result of the architecture.”
Mark Chandler, chief legal officer of San Jose, California-based Cisco, said in a blog post the settlement—reached with “no evidence that any customer’s security was ever breached”—is a sign “standards by which suppliers are judged are … changing.”
“Nothing illustrates better the way standards are changing than our engagement in resolving a dispute involving video security software products sold by us in Cisco’s fiscal years 2008 through 2013,” Chandler said in the post, titled “A Changed Environment Requires a Changed Approach.” ”In short, what seemed reasonable at one point no longer meets the needs of our stakeholders today.”
The software product at the heart of the case was acquired by Cisco in 2007 through its acquisition of original developer Broadware.
Chandler said Broadware intentionally designed Video Surveillance Manager with an open architecture to allow customization, a structure that meant “video feeds could theoretically have been subject to hacking.”
“Evaluating these facts today, we’ve now agreed to make a payment that includes, what is in effect, a partial refund to the US federal government and 16 states for products purchased between Cisco’s fiscal years 2008 and 2013,” said the CLO.
He noted Cisco urged users to build additional security features to software licensed from the company in a 2009 best practices guide. In 2013, Cisco issued a software upgrade that “addressed security features. The company stopped selling Video Surveillance Manager the following year.
“While this is a legacy issue which no longer exists, it matters to us to recognize that times and expectations have changed,” Chandler said.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250