Experts Warn General Counsel About Gun Violence Legal Risks for Companies
Walmart, one of the largest sellers of firearms and ammunition in the country, has faced increasing public pressure to stop selling guns.
August 14, 2019 at 05:39 PM
4 minute read
In an increasingly violent America where guns on average kill 100 people each day, experts say companies involved in selling, making or distributing guns should take a new look at their legal risks.
There are signals that some companies are looking at these risks. Dick’s Sporting Goods announced in March it was pulling guns and ammunition from 125 of its more than 700 stores. The company’s general counsel was not available and a spokesman declined comment on its policies. The giant retailer Walmart Inc., which is facing possible lawsuits after a mass shooting at its El Paso, Texas, store Aug. 3, also is weighing its options on guns.
The warnings are coming from legal experts like Eric Tirschwell, managing director for litigation and national enforcement policy at the fast-growing nonprofit group called Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund.
“What I would say to a general counsel of a retailer allowing guns in their stores, first of all, allowing firearms is a choice, not a requirement,” Tirschwell told Corporate Counsel. He said the choice to allow guns in retail stores brings “increasing and significant risks. It will increasingly expose you to lawsuits, higher insurance costs, loss of customers and other adverse consequences.”
Tirschwell said his group has also been involved in pursuing policies to persuade big retailers not to allow guns in their stores. Starbucks Coffee Co., Target Corp. and other stores, he said, have adopted policies against the open carrying of weapons.
As for dealers, manufacturers and distributors, Tirschwell said his group offers best practices to ensure compliance with firearm laws. The group urges them to take “responsibility to do whatever they can to make sure their guns do not end up in the wrong hands.”
If all else fails, Everytown can and does bring lawsuits. It also files amicus briefs, such as one before the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to protect the right of states and localities to impose some types of firearm regulations.
Another expert, Philip Cook, is a professor emeritus in the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University who has studied the economics of crime. He noted some lawsuits for negligent distribution of firearms are making their way through the courts, but he sees an even greater risk to retailers.
“The El Paso Walmart case suggests that retailers may have to be concerned about protecting customers and staff from gun rampages,” Cook said. “The good news is that rampages of this sort are very rare. On the other hand, the publicity and eventual settlement may prove catastrophic.”
Against this backdrop, Bentonville, Arkansas-based Walmart, one of the largest sellers of firearms and ammunition in the country, has faced increasing public pressure to stop selling guns.
A Walmart spokesman said, “In areas of the U.S. where we sell firearms, we have a long-standing commitment to do so safely, responsibly and within the guidelines of all federal, state and local laws.”
The spokesman added the company goes “beyond federal law by requiring customers to pass a background check before purchasing any firearm; we do not sell handguns in our stores, except for in Alaska.” In 2018, he said Walmart stopped selling modern sporting rifles, raised the minimum age to buy a gun or ammunition to 21, and removed items from its website resembling assault-style rifles, including nonlethal air guns and toys.
As to whether it is considering new policy changes on gun sales, the spokesman referred to an Aug. 7 statement by CEO Douglas McMillon. McMillon was visiting El Paso to recognize the heroism of some store employees who risked their lives to help customers escape the mass shooting.
In the statement, McMillon acknowledged that Walmart has been touched by the violence, both in El Paso and in a July 30 store shooting by a suspended worker that killed two other employees in Southaven, Mississippi.
“We are a learning organization, and, as you can imagine, we will work to understand the many important issues that arise from El Paso and Southaven, as well as those that have been raised in the broader national discussion around gun violence,” McMillon said.
The statement continued, “We will be thoughtful and deliberate in our responses, and we will act in a way that reflects the best values and ideals of our company, with a focus on serving the needs of our customers, associates and communities.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute read$25M Grubhub Settlement Sheds Light on How Other Gig Economy Firms Can Avoid Regulatory Trouble
8 minute readEx-Red Robin CLO Joins Norton Rose Fulbright After Helping Sell Latest Employer for $4.9 Billion
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250