Chief Legal Officer of IPO-Bound WeWork Made Almost $900K Last Year
Co-working space leasing company WeWork detailed chief legal officer Jen Berrent's 2018 compensation in its S-1 filing with the SEC Wednesday.
August 15, 2019 at 02:38 PM
2 minute read
The parent company of WeWork, which leases work spaces in shared offices, officially filed to go public Wednesday with an S-1 revealing its chief legal officer’s 2018 compensation.
Jen Berrent, the chief legal officer and co-president of the We Co., earned almost $900,000 in cash compensation last year, according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing. Her 2018 salary was $871,154 with an added $7,731 from “all other compensation.” That’s a total of $878,885.
She also has millions in stock options that have not yet vested, according to the S-1—347,424 unearned shares with an estimated market value of $12,865,111. A WeWork representative declined to comment on Berrent’s compensation package and role at the company.
Berrent is one of three named executive officers on the We Co.’s S-1 filing, alongside chief financial officer and co-president Artie Minson and chief executive officer and chairman of the board Adam Neumann. Based on the S-1 filing, Berrent earned the highest cash pay of the three.
She joined the New York-based company in 2014 as chief culture officer and CLO. In July 2017, Berrent took on the additional chief operating officer role. Eugen Miropolski replaced Berrent as COO in April while she stayed on as legal chief.
Before joining the We Co., Berrent worked as associate general counsel of Longitude Inc., an associate at Covington & Burling and a partner at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, where she led the New York emerging company practice group. She earned her J.D. at New York University School of Law.
Wednesday’s S-1 filing also detailed potential legal risks WeWork faces, including discrimination or harassment claims and other employment matters, a rising number of privacy regulations and infringement of their trademark. Much of WeWork’s current legal spend relates to buying and leasing work spaces.
Teams from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett are advising the We Co. on its initial public offering.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Tales From the Trenches: What Outside Counsel Do That GCs Find Inexcusable
Venus Williams Tells WIPL Crowd: 'Living Your Dreams Should Be Easy'
The 2024 WIPL Awards: Law Firm Mentor and Mentee Collaboration
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
- 2Steve Bannon 'We Build The Wall' Fraud Trial Pushed to February 2025
- 3'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
- 4Questions About Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act Remain Unanswered
- 5Santa Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250