Four Matter Management Mistakes Your In-house Team Might Be Making
A matter management platform acts as a centralized system for all the legal department's activities, allows the team to track current information, and ultimately affects the larger outcomes and goals of the business.
August 16, 2019 at 02:39 PM
5 minute read
Matter management for corporate legal teams is complicated. The business depends on the legal department to see the big picture and act strategically while keeping a close eye on all the little details of each matter. It’s easy to see why matter management presents a challenge.
Throughout the course of each matter, in-house lawyers must coordinate with internal teams, collaborate with external counsel, track spend, ensure matter progress, mitigate risk and more—all while tracking status, managing matter documents and capturing critical information from email communications and meetings.
As corporate legal teams focus on streamlining processes to improve efficiency, there are four pitfalls that must be overcome to optimize matter management.
Using an assortment of disconnected systems
How many technology solutions are you currently using for your matter management processes? Your team may use a client portal provided by external counsel for collaboration, an intranet for knowledge sharing, email for sending documents, a task or team management system to keep everyone on track and spreadsheets to monitor and report matter progress, just to name a few.
With your processes and matter data scattered throughout these systems, collaboration is minimal, efficiency is stunted and real-time progress reporting is nearly impossible. It’s probably obvious to everyone working within this system that the collection of solutions isn’t ideal.
Matter management platforms are more accessible than ever, but even if a new solution is out of reach given a tight (or nonexistent) legal technology budget, working with your IT team to identify integration opportunities within your current technology stack can be a quick way to boost efficiency and optimize processes.
Limiting transparency and visibility
If your legal department is using static spreadsheets to track matters, you know how quickly information can be overlooked, become out of date or be entered inaccurately. Documents and information stored in local drives, email and spreadsheets make it difficult for teams to quickly access the data they need to make informed decisions and report to management.
So, inevitably, questions arise: Which person has the most up-to-date information? Where are the relevant documents? Who is responsible for the next action to move a matter forward? This lack of transparency within the legal team can silo knowledge, set back progress and impede the team’s ability to give accurate and timely advice.
Missing opportunities to automate
Though matter management is complex, it is also full of routine, time-consuming tasks and processes that could be automated for greater efficiency. Workflow automation can be leveraged to make sure that matters are instantly recorded, assigned, actioned and tracked. Matters can also be escalated when they fall within certain risk parameters. Not only does this reduce manual efforts, giving more time back to your team to focus on higher-value tasks, but it also ensures consistency, reduces risk and ensures consistent data collection through every aspect of your matters.
Letting your data languish
If you’re guilty of committing any of the first three matter management mistakes, it’s likely that your ability to capture key data from your matters is also suffering. Without reliable data from previous matters, you’re missing out on opportunities to optimize processes, forecast risk and communicate the value of your work to the business.
Every date, every party and every clause in a matter is a data point just waiting to be leveraged for the benefit of the department and the business. The insight you can gain from this data can help paint a picture of how effectively your team manages matters or alternately bring to light an opportunity for improvement.
Matter data is crucial to the continual improvement of the department. As businesses demand more from the legal team, you can’t afford to ignore the knowledge that lies in your data.
Improving matter management
These challenges can all be addressed with a matter management platform. Acting as a centralized system for all of your matter activities, a matter management platform allows your team to track, manage and collaborate on their contract negotiations, NDAs, litigation, employee disputes, claims and compliance issues.
The perfect system incorporates productivity features like secure file sharing, document and data collaboration, automated workflows and task management that empower in-house legal teams to create transparency and efficiency.
In addition, matter management affects the larger outcomes and goals of the business. With a single matter management platform, you have a better way to quickly and easily show your value to internal stakeholders. Dashboards with real-time data visualizations available within the platform enable you to clearly communicate and report the value and effectiveness of the legal department and their work.
A matter management system that integrates with existing systems allows you to bring together your solutions, collaborate transparently and capture and analyze key data. With the insight provided, you’ll be able to better balance workloads, communicate with internal and external teams and improve efficiency.
Donovan Alexander is Senior Solutions Consultant at HighQ. He empowers corporate legal teams and law firms with legal technology solutions designed to meet each client’s unique needs. He focuses on ensuring that HighQ clients can create value from their technology investment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Appears Sympathetic to Law Requiring Porn Sites to Verify Users' Age
- 2Cybersecurity Breaches, Cyberbullying, and Ways to Help Protect Clients From Both
- 3AI in 2025: Five Key Predictions on How It Will Reshape International Law Firms
- 4Justice Known for Asking 'Tough Questions' Resolves to Improve Civility
- 5Robinson & Cole Elects New Partners and Counsel
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250