General Mills Takes Lead to Reduce Pesticides in Supply Chain, Avoids Proxy Fight
General Mills recently released its Global Responsibility Report 2019 and published new information, which outlines specific strategies for reducing pesticide use.
August 19, 2019 at 05:13 PM
4 minute read
By stepping up to lead efforts on sustainable agriculture, General Mills Inc. has dodged a proxy fight with shareholder activist group As You Sow over the use of pesticides in the company’s supply chain.
Minnesota-based General Mills recently released its Global Responsibility Report 2019 and published new information, which outlines specific strategies for reducing pesticide use.
“By this action, General Mills is stepping up as a leader among its peers,” said a statement from As You Sow.
In March As You Sow and shareholders had placed a resolution on the company’s agenda for the Sept. 24 annual meeting. The resolution specifically names the company’s popular Cheerios brand cereal as being implicated in lawsuits over pesticide residue.
A similar resolution last year won 31% support. They withdrew this year’s resolution Aug. 15 after the company made public the new information dealing with pesticides.
General Mills referred questions to the report and its other published statements. It said general counsel Richard Allendorf was not available for comment.
The company’s published information lists four key strategies to reduce pesticide use: a detailed commitment to regenerative agriculture, continued work on integrated pest management, expansion of organic acreage, and protection of pollinators. The strategies “directly reduce farmer reliance on pesticides and other agrochemicals,” the company statement said.
Christy Spees, As You Sow’s environmental health program manager, and president Danielle Fugere have been working with General Mills’ investor relations and in-house counsel on resolving the pesticide issue.
Fugere, an attorney, said in a statement that the food industry has been locked into a system of pesticide use that is inflexible and harmful, damaging the pollinators needed to sustain agriculture. “We are pleased to see General Mills stepping up as a leader in moving toward clean food innovation,” she added.
Spees told Corporate Counsel that the group’s work with General Mills began in 2017 when it seemed the company had no public policy on pesticide use. She called it a “reputational risk” as well as an environmental one.
“Not much progress was seen after last year’s resolution, so we filed another one for 2019,” Spees said. “That brought the company back into conversations” that led to its publishing new commitments.
She said General Mills is the first company in the food industry to commit to regenerative agriculture, “which we see as a really major improvement and hope other food manufacturers will follow. They are also the first to take this explicit stance on pesticides … that they want their producers to use fewer pesticides.”
In General Mills’ 2019 responsibility report, chairman and CEO Jeffrey Harmening states, “We face tremendous change in our industry, with unprecedented social and environmental challenges. Navigating this landscape requires transformation and innovation at every level. We continue taking bold actions to advance sustainability … [and] we embrace our responsibility to help achieve a stable climate, healthy watersheds, strong ecosystems and better lives for farmers.”
Here are some other highlights from the report:
- General Mills is now the second-largest U.S. organic food producer.
- 85% of 10 priority ingredients are sustainably sourced, and the company is working toward 100%.
- It has made a 13% decrease in greenhouse gas emissions across its chain since 2010, with goals of reaching 28% by 2025 and sustainable levels by 2050.
- It has planted 55,000 acres of pollinator habitat.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Climate-Smart Beef'?: DC Lawsuit Accuses Tyson Foods of False Advertising
3 minute read'Lawyers Are Always Responsible': 5th Circuit Discards AI Disclosure Rule After Pushback
SEC's Proposed Climate Disclosure Rule Draws Concern From Left-Leaning Senators
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250