Transforming Corporate Legal Departments for Success in the 'Market of the Future'
Many corporations are facing unpredictable events or drivers happening outside an organization that can be either negative or positive, but present greater volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity (VUCA), which makes it more difficult for leadership to make decisions.
August 20, 2019 at 01:45 PM
11 minute read
Many corporations are facing unpredictable events or drivers happening outside an organization that can be either negative or positive, but present greater volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity (VUCA), which makes it more difficult for leadership to make decisions. However, this provides a terrific opportunity to drive change and positively transform the business. This VUCA environment has also impacted the legal industry, as it transitions from a lawyer-centric guild to a customer-centric marketplace, with the corporate legal departments (CLDs) being the primary drivers of change.
Corporate legal departments are now being courted by all providers in the legal services ecosystem: Law firms, alternative legal service providers (ALSPs), Big Four and other service providers. The CLDs are in turn pushing their providers, both for the business and the practice of law, to be more technologically savvy and deliver a combination of legal, business and technology capabilities, to augment their expertise, and enable them to improve their efficiency and effectiveness.
While most CLDs have been focused on controlling costs there continues to be pressure from the C-suite for the in-house legal department to become a strategic adviser to senior leadership and support overall firm objectives. This provides significant opportunity for the department to transform the business and move from being a cost-center to a value-driver and a key partner to the C-suite. For any transformation to be successful it is critical to have the buy-in and support of the C-suite.
|Burning Platform for Change
The global legal services market in 2017 was $849 billion and is forecasted to grow to $1,011 billion by 2021. Of this one-third of the spend will be driven by CLDs, which is $283 billion (individuals as a group drive more legal spend but do not have the clout to drive change). The average large corporation (with revenues in excess of $10 billion) spends approximately $110 million on its legal department with about 60% of that going to their external legal service providers. While this spend is only 1.0% of the corporation’s total revenues, it is closer to being 10%-plus of the organization’s total profit margin. The large spend on legal services along with other internal and external drivers are putting pressure on corporate legal departments to further evolve and transform their business.
Need for Further Action by Corporate Legal Departments
To date, most CLDs have focused on controlling outside counsel costs and leveraging technology to improve efficiency and effectiveness. On the other hand, the C-suite is looking for the key personnel in the CLD to act as company leaders, support the business objectives and manage legal risk. Focusing on controlling outside counsel costs is a lower priority for them. There appears to be a disconnect between where the personnel in the corporate legal department spend their time, versus where the CEO and the board of directors perceive the greatest value from their in-house legal department.
This creates a potential opportunity for corporate legal departments to increase their role as a strategic adviser to the C-suite, by automating or outsourcing the more mundane repetitive tasks, focusing on the more value-added strategic tasks, while proactively working with leadership to mitigate legal issues as the senior leaders seek to innovate and transform the organization’s operations and services.
Potential Actions for Corporate Legal Departments to Take
Operating in a VUCA world requires the corporate legal department to take a different approach to running the business. It requires taking a more proactive approach to guiding leadership, running business operations, democratizing information, speeding up interactions and moving decision making to the front lines of the business. To enable a CLD to do this, below are some suggested actions:
- Act as the strategic legal adviser to the C-suite—According to a study, two-thirds of the world’s top 1,000 enterprises will adopt digital transformation as a key strategic goal and will spend $369 billion on digital transformation by 2020. As innovative technologies are leveraged in business operations, often the team developing the solutions, does not understand the legal and regulatory implications of the use of these technologies, until too late in the process, which can result in significant cost overruns or delays. The legal team needs to play a key role in advising the C-suite about the right balance between speed-to-market and ensuring legal and regulatory compliance. For instance, a startup launched with a large services firm, took 16 months to obtain legal, risk and regulatory approval. On the other hand, the legal professional at a startup competing with Skype advised the firm to get regulatory approval that took 18 months by which time Skype had established market leadership.
In addition, the general counsel should have a seat at the table as the leadership lays out the plan to transform and evolve the business, to proactively advise on any potential legal and regulatory issues that could arise. To enable the team to have the bandwidth to provide more strategic insights, it is key to automate or outsource more mundane and repetitive tasks performed by the lawyers.
- Focus attention on the 80:20 rule—Focus on 20% of the tasks or legal practice areas, where the team spends 80% of its time or money. Usually these are about 10-15 areas. For each of them: |
- Create a detailed journey map of all the steps in the process;
- Identify the pain points/areas where there is potential for increased efficiency/reduced spend;
- Determine which tasks could be automated by leveraging technology, sent to a low-cost service provider, outsourced as a managed service, or performed inhouse.
- Complete this journey mapping and share internally with staff and with preferred law firm, ALSPs, LegalTech’s and service providers so they can deliver solutions to best address the pain points.
- Create a single-source of truth—Develop a single platform for all internal legal professionals in the department. This portal would be the front-end for each legal professional to go to perform all their daily tasks and should include all the knowledge management information, legal cases data, tools and solutions available across the network. This improves efficiency and increases consistency of approach. All information on the portal is aligned by the user-journey, i.e. for an M&A transaction, all tools, solutions and content, should be available at each stage of the process. At the back end, the best tools and solutions, from the leading LegalTech’s and service should be added to the platform. In addition, analytics should also be added to the platform. Identify start-ups, and legal services and content providers with whom to form strategic alliances or partnerships. For example, a Big Four practice area launched a platform for their auditors, aligned with their user journey, and supported by industry-leading tools, technologies, content and analytics, to execute on serving customers more effectively and efficiently.
- Establish a service provider ecosystem to improve business process and efficiencies—Create an ecosystem of all legal services providers, potentially enabled by the Distributed Ledger Technology, where supported by relevant business and regulatory frameworks, to:
-Efficiently execute legal services—For dispute resolution and arbitration, development and execution of smart contracts; filing corporate returns, registration of intellectual property rights;
-Verify and authenticate legal business operations—For document management, billing and expense management, etc.;
-Improve efficiency of legal tasks performed—For maintaining chain of documents during, custody cases, M&A transactions, recording and maintaining historical case-related information, and notarizing documents.
Many experiments are being run by corporates in financial and legal services to test this concept.
- Request additional services from law firms—All law firms sit on significant amount of legal and client information. Request law firm to provide additional value-added services like industry benchmarking, knowledge management, data analytics on various type of cases, M&A deal success ratio, and other topics of interest. Leverage law firms for advice on topics that could require lawyer-client confidentiality, which other legal service providers cannot deliver.
- Establish internal innovation challenges or programs—For most corporations the war for talent is going to be the biggest issue within the next few years, as professionals seek to find roles that are meaningful and challenging. It is key for the corporate legal department to provide the professionals with hands-on opportunities to innovate the business, as they are doing a lot of work and have the closest view on the challenges and pain points. The programs can be internal ideation session, design thinking workshops with clients, time and funding to drive innovation ideas, etc.
- Other potential actions—Since innovating the business is not the core function of the Corporate Legal Department, collaborate with various external experts to execute on these actions. Also, if the departments can partner with other players in their industry to solve some of the challenges facing the CLDs in their space, it is likely to be more effective.
- Creating a corporate venture fund—In industries where it is permissible to invest in start-ups, establish a corporate venture fund to invest in LegalTech’s working on solutions to address key industry pain points. Many large conglomerates, including some leading financial providers, have successfully launched venture funds, to support innovation in the industry.
- Establishing incubators or accelerators—Fund program(s) at an accelerator or incubator with LegalTech startups focusing on agile experiments for the business. Some large financial institutions are already running these programs for their legal businesses.
- Creating an industry sandbox—Work with industry bodies such as Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC) or Association of Corporate Counsels (ACC) to establish an industry sandbox to experiment on different solutions, with professionals from CLDs acting as advisers to guide the start-ups, providing non-confidential data to run the experiments and then potentially testing out the solutions in the business. Many regulatory bodies globally are running sandboxes, some of which are focused on FinTech and RegTech.
- Running or sponsoring a legal industry hackathon—Run or sponsor legal industry hackathons to get access to ideas and solutions developed by the participants to rapidly solve business challenges with the optionality to work with the teams to test and scale their solutions for internal use. A leading global legal information service provider used this approach for accelerating growth by sponsoring a legal industry hackathon and getting access to all the solutions developed during the event.
There are many other potential actions that the corporate legal departments could take to drive innovation and business transformation. The GC needs to pick the action or actions they see as appropriate, and the best fit.
|Approach to Business Transformation
Realize that business transformation is a complex, messy and iterative process and each organization’s journey is unique. No one-size-fits-all. One approach for business transformation is to follow the 6Ds—Steps in a Business Transformation: Discover and Analyze Market; Define Strategy and Outcomes; Design Approach and Detail; Distill, Iterate and Learn; Decide and Evaluate; and Deliver and Integrate. The actual actions taken by each corporate legal department would be determined by where they are currently in their transformation journey.
Conclusion
The role of general counsel has significantly changed in recent years from a support function into becoming a strategic adviser to the C-suite. The position has evolved to include being a legal adviser, risk and crisis manager, corporate conscience, and strategic business partner and this has put pressure on the corporate legal department to continue to evolve and transform their area of the business; many of the actions discussed in this article have been tried and tested at various corporations to drive business transformation. The corporate legal department must determine what works best for them and is aligned with their vision of becoming a key partner to the C-suite.
Nita Sanger is the chief executive officer of Idea Innovate Consulting, a boutique consulting firm focused on business transformation and growth helping businesses be successful in a volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA), business environment. She has 20 years of experience working with global large and midsized corporates and startups and scale-ups in financial, professional and legal services. She can be reached at [email protected].
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Appropriate Exemption in Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
- 2DOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
- 3New Partners at Cummings & Lockwood, Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey
- 4'Extra Government'?: NY Top Court Eyes Ethics Commission's Constitutionality
- 5South Texas College of Law Houston Selects New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250