Adding on the Chief Administrative Officer Role: A Q&A With Liberty Media Chief Legal Officer Rich Baer
Baer recently took on the additional role of chief administrative officer at Liberty and has worked with the company's founder and CEO on what that role will entail and how it may look different from other companies that have a chief administrative officer.
August 21, 2019 at 06:20 PM
6 minute read
Since Rich Baer first became a general counsel, he said the role has grown to much more than telling executives what they can and cannot do.
He has been in general counsel roles since 2002 when he became the general counsel for telecommunications company Qwest Communications International Inc. After leaving Qwest, Baer became the chief legal officer at UnitedHealth Group and landed the job as the top lawyer at Liberty Media in 2013.
In July, Baer took on the additional role of chief administrative officer at Liberty and has worked with the company's founder, John Malone, and CEO, Greg Maffei, on what that role will entail and how it may look different from other companies that have a chief administrative officer.
Baer spoke with Corporate Counsel about his new role, working with the C-suite and how the legal department at Liberty Media operates. This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
Corporate Counsel: What does the role of the chief administrative officer at Liberty Media entail?
Rich Baer: We're still trying to put our arms around what the role should be. I've been a chief administrative officer before when I was general counsel at Qwest, so I have some insight into what it could be. We want this role to have a focus on talent identification and talent development across our portfolio companies. That is going to be the first area of focus. The beauty of Liberty is that because of our nimbleness and the fact that we're so small by way of the number of our employees, we can kind of create and modify this role over time to make it anything we want it to be.
CC: What are some of the challenges of transitioning from chief legal officer to chief administrative officer?
RB: They are very different roles. I don't think the legal profession is known for its ability to develop talent. I've had to learn about this over the years. I've had the benefit of working with some immensely talented CEOs and boards over the years who have taught me how to think about talent, hiring, development and leadership. That has been a challenge just too simply learn it.
Another challenge has been to see what works for me and what works for the organization. Qwest was a very traditional company telecom company that has been around for 100 years. They're highly structured. Liberty is probably as opposite to a telecom company as you can find. We're tiny, we're entrepreneurial, and we're innovative. So the CAO role at Liberty is going to be dramatically different then it was at Qwest.
CC: How did you first break out of the lawyer mentality and begin to learn how to work with the C-suite?
RB: When I first became a general counsel I had no idea what the role was supposed to be. I worked with an amazing CEO at the time, Dick Notebaert at Qwest, and he really helped me think through how the role could be so much broader. If you thought not as a lawyer but as a business leader within the organization. He helped train me to develop those skills.
CC: Is there anything that you can take from the CAO role into your role as Liberty's CLO?
RB: You have to practice what you preach. I can't be out there focusing on talent development without doing that within my own organization. I want to make sure that whatever I'm learning and whatever we're developing more broadly, the legal function has the benefit of that as well.
You have to give your talent within the legal organization other opportunities. Those many times may involve lateral moves or lateral areas of experience that you give them exposure to.
CC: What is the size of the legal department at Liberty?
RB: Liberty is one of the most unique companies in the world in that our market cap compared to our number of employees; that ratio is probably the highest of any company. Our market cap on any day given day, collectively, is probably $50 [billion] to $60 billion.
We only have 85 employees and we only have four lawyers in the legal department. We have a unique model where we have a huge, complex company but very few in-house lawyers. We have an outsourcing model where we use principally one law firm, Baker Botts, to handle much of work. They function in many ways as part of our law department.
CC: Are there any plans in the future to expand the legal department at Liberty?
RB: Our lawyers work really hard. We have five public companies where we are the legal department for those companies. Those companies also own other companies, so there are a lot of legal issues at the Liberty level and at the portfolio company level with a limited number of lawyers at Liberty. If the volume of work continues to increase, we may bring on a lawyer or two.
I like the outsourcing model. I've always struggled with the role of the in-house lawyer versus the role of the outside counsel. I think the balance we've struck, while unique, is a model that works extremely well for our type of company.
CC: Do you have any alternative fee arrangements with Baker Botts?
RB: I don't think alternative fee arrangements are all they're cracked up to be. They might give a company a little bit more visibility into what its legal fees will be in the future, but that doesn't mean they're going to save money or make their legal spend more effective or efficient.
I also think they're a creature of law firms. I don't think the partners at law firms that came up with them went to their partners and said: "hey I have a way we can make less money." They're quite aware that these fixed fee arrangements are, oftentimes, a higher margin strategy for them as well.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoogle Fails to Secure Long-Term Stay of Order Requiring It to Open App Store to Rivals
'Am I Spending Time in the Right Place?' SPX Technologies CLO Cherée Johnson on Living and Leading With Intent
9 minute read'It Was the Next Graduation': How an In-House Lawyer Became a Serial Entrepreneur
9 minute readRenee Meisel, GC of UnitedLex, on Understanding and Growing the Business
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250