Gender Pay Gap for General Counsel Has Grown, Study Says
Equilar's latest General Counsel Pay Trends study shows that male GCs earned 18.6% more than their female counterparts—the largest pay discrepancy since Equilar began studying GC wages in 2014.
August 28, 2019 at 04:59 PM
4 minute read
The gender pay gap for U.S.-based general counsel is widening, according to a new report.
Equilar's latest General Counsel Pay Trends study shows that male GCs earned 18.6% more than their female counterparts—the largest pay discrepancy since Equilar began studying GC wages in 2014.
The report crunches pay data for top lawyers and named executive officers at Equilar 500 companies, a revenue-based index of publicly traded companies in the U.S. The latest wage statistics are based on Securities and Exchange Commission filings from companies that ended the fiscal year between March 2018 and February 2019.
In earlier studies, the average GC gender wage gap hovered around 11%. But from 2017 to 2018, the median total pay for male GCs jumped from $2.52 million to $2.63 million, while female GC pay dipped from $2.44 million to $2.21 million.
John Gilmore, managing partner at executive search consulting firm BarkerGilmore, which contributed to the report, noted that the top six highest-paid GCs this year are men, while women account for just four of the top 20.
Despite the discouraging stats, Gilmore said in an interview Wednesday that "clients are out actively trying to attract more women and minorities to the GC ranks."
But he acknowledged that, in general, when "you're looking at some of the larger companies you're finding a lot of men in those roles and they're being extremely well-compensated because they're [named executive officers] and they have a seat at that table."
He added, "Why aren't more women or minorities being prepared as successors for those Fortune 50 companies that are paying the most money? That's a good question."
Equilar's findings echo the results of the recent 2019 General Counsel Compensation Survey from Corporate Counsel affiliate ALM Intelligence, which found that GC pay is up as a whole, but not for women. The survey also revealed that men got an average bonus of $826,131, compared with $285,754 for women—a gap of more than $540,000.
The Equilar study also showed that the median total pay for GCs hit $2.6 million, which is a 3.7% increase over the previous year. At the same time, CEOs at companies with $7 billion to $10 billion in revenue brought home four times the total median compensation of their chief lawyers.
Digging deeper into the pay stats, performance incentives accounted for the largest chunk of GC compensation in 2018. The median salary for GCs in the study was $565,000 while their performance incentives averaged $718,000, dwarfing the median stock award of $301,000.
As in earlier studies, in-house leaders in the health care sector take the award for having the highest median total compensation, which edged above $4 million in the latest report, up from about $3.9 million last year.
The tech and financial sectors followed closely behind with median total compensation of about $3.1 million. But GCs in the financial realm saw a 36% pay increase compared with 2017, when their median total compensation was $2.2 million.
At the same time, pay for GCs in the basic materials drifted back down to earth after leaping more than 27% from 2016 to 2017. In 2018, their year-over-year pay dropped by nearly 17%.
Read More:
GC Pay Is Up for Many but More in Some Sectors Than Others: Survey
The 2019 GC Compensation Survey: Pay's Moving On Up
Pay Equity Practices Take Off as New Gender Pay Gap Laws Spread
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readWells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readMLB's Texas Rangers Search for a New GC and a Broadcasting Deal
Trending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250