Why Collaboration Is the Key to Contract Management Success
Contract lifecycle management (CLM) tools have provided some relief to the cumbersome and resource-intensive contract management process.
August 28, 2019 at 02:20 PM
5 minute read
The average business manages between 20,000 and 40,000 contracts at any given time. With that kind of volume, and the risk of compounding inefficiencies in time and cost, firms simply can't afford to get contract management wrong.
Contract lifecycle management (CLM) tools have provided some relief to the cumbersome and resource-intensive contract management process. Many of these tools, however, don't go far enough in their ability to streamline the complete contract process, from creation to negotiation, review and archival. Most CLMs focus on automating the contracting process and facilitate the maintenance and storage of contracts.
There is a key component of contracting, however, that is being overlooked—collaboration.
Collaboration is inherent to the contracting process with multiple stakeholders, including attorneys, outside counsel, accountants and other legal professionals, weighing in, escalating requests, and answering questions. The time spent on a typical contract averages about 40 hours according to the International Association for Contract and Commercial Management, with work divided among legal, procurement, operations, project management, finance and compliance professionals.
The vast majority of this effort takes place over email requiring attorneys to spend precious time sifting through their inbox, shuffling tabs and searching folders. More than 60% of legal professionals said administrative tasks, like these, were their biggest source of frustration at work. These tasks add up to a lot of churn when multiplied across the many contracts that an in-house legal department or their law firm services which, collectively, create drag on the contracting process.
|The Next Evolution in Contract Management
The current process is inefficient and represents a missed opportunity for businesses to enhance productivity and improve knowledge capture. The emergence of what I call "collaborative contract management" or CCM solves this problem by taking a disjointed and disorganized process and integrating it into one platform.
CCM goes far beyond a simple contract repository. CCM introduces collaborative capability into contract management tools to facilitate real-time editing and communication across all stakeholders. By streamlining the contract workflow, business and legal professionals are not only able to work more productively but can also more easily leverage input and insight from one another.
|The Benefits of Collaboration
Research from Harvard Law Distinguished Fellow Heidi Gardner has found that average revenue per customer rises among firms that have a high degree of collaboration. Better collaboration enables organizations to recognize and elevate employee contributions. Studies show businesses that highlight employee contributions enjoy higher morale. CCM ensures all individuals are able to contribute to the contract process in a visible and valuable way. Such collaboration can also build stronger bonds between colleagues.
The use of technology is increasingly popular among legal professionals. Nearly 60% of attorneys under the age of 40 access their documents and case information, including contracts, online according to the American Bar Association. Adopting innovative and synergistic technology, such as CCMs, may help businesses attract better talent.
CCM also allows organizations to better control contract costs, which continue to increase. The International Association for Contract and Commercial Management estimates the amount businesses spend on low-risk contracts increased by nearly 40% from 2011 to 2017. While these low-risk contracts average $6,900, moderately complex contracts average $21,300 and highly complex contracts can exceed $100,000.
When the already costly contracts process is not managed as efficiently as possible, firms stand to lose valuable time and money. Businesses lose an estimated 9% of annual revenue from ineffective contract management. The ability of CCMs to improve productivity and workflow can help cut unnecessary cost in this area.
|Investing in the Future
Recognizing the need to retool the contract management process, the legal industry has embraced new solutions. The market for contract management is expected to reach $3.2 billion globally by 2023.
In 2019 alone, disruptors in the legal technology space have received major investments. Aavenir, for example, is among the companies that are leading in the evolving CLM space. ContractPodAi, a U.K.-based AI powered CLM platform just secured $55 million in investment funding. Cloud-based contracts management firm Icertis also raised $115 million in funding this year.
As organizations invest in CLMs and other contract management solutions, it's important to look for collaborative capability or, rather, a true CCM solution. Without it, they'll be missing out on the full potential of contract management technology.
Monica Zent is an entrepreneur, investor, businesswoman and trusted legal adviser to leading global brands, over a period that spans decades. She is the founder of leading legal services company, ZentLaw and its innovative ZentLaw Labs. She is also the founder of LawDesk360, the workflow efficiency platform for legal departments and law firms. When she's not running companies, Zent runs distance as an endurance athlete.@monicazent
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readA New Approach for Protecting Confidential Information During an Employee Activist Campaign
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250