Why Collaboration Is the Key to Contract Management Success
Contract lifecycle management (CLM) tools have provided some relief to the cumbersome and resource-intensive contract management process.
August 28, 2019 at 02:20 PM
5 minute read
The average business manages between 20,000 and 40,000 contracts at any given time. With that kind of volume, and the risk of compounding inefficiencies in time and cost, firms simply can't afford to get contract management wrong.
Contract lifecycle management (CLM) tools have provided some relief to the cumbersome and resource-intensive contract management process. Many of these tools, however, don't go far enough in their ability to streamline the complete contract process, from creation to negotiation, review and archival. Most CLMs focus on automating the contracting process and facilitate the maintenance and storage of contracts.
There is a key component of contracting, however, that is being overlooked—collaboration.
Collaboration is inherent to the contracting process with multiple stakeholders, including attorneys, outside counsel, accountants and other legal professionals, weighing in, escalating requests, and answering questions. The time spent on a typical contract averages about 40 hours according to the International Association for Contract and Commercial Management, with work divided among legal, procurement, operations, project management, finance and compliance professionals.
The vast majority of this effort takes place over email requiring attorneys to spend precious time sifting through their inbox, shuffling tabs and searching folders. More than 60% of legal professionals said administrative tasks, like these, were their biggest source of frustration at work. These tasks add up to a lot of churn when multiplied across the many contracts that an in-house legal department or their law firm services which, collectively, create drag on the contracting process.
The Next Evolution in Contract Management
The current process is inefficient and represents a missed opportunity for businesses to enhance productivity and improve knowledge capture. The emergence of what I call "collaborative contract management" or CCM solves this problem by taking a disjointed and disorganized process and integrating it into one platform.
CCM goes far beyond a simple contract repository. CCM introduces collaborative capability into contract management tools to facilitate real-time editing and communication across all stakeholders. By streamlining the contract workflow, business and legal professionals are not only able to work more productively but can also more easily leverage input and insight from one another.
The Benefits of Collaboration
Research from Harvard Law Distinguished Fellow Heidi Gardner has found that average revenue per customer rises among firms that have a high degree of collaboration. Better collaboration enables organizations to recognize and elevate employee contributions. Studies show businesses that highlight employee contributions enjoy higher morale. CCM ensures all individuals are able to contribute to the contract process in a visible and valuable way. Such collaboration can also build stronger bonds between colleagues.
The use of technology is increasingly popular among legal professionals. Nearly 60% of attorneys under the age of 40 access their documents and case information, including contracts, online according to the American Bar Association. Adopting innovative and synergistic technology, such as CCMs, may help businesses attract better talent.
CCM also allows organizations to better control contract costs, which continue to increase. The International Association for Contract and Commercial Management estimates the amount businesses spend on low-risk contracts increased by nearly 40% from 2011 to 2017. While these low-risk contracts average $6,900, moderately complex contracts average $21,300 and highly complex contracts can exceed $100,000.
When the already costly contracts process is not managed as efficiently as possible, firms stand to lose valuable time and money. Businesses lose an estimated 9% of annual revenue from ineffective contract management. The ability of CCMs to improve productivity and workflow can help cut unnecessary cost in this area.
Investing in the Future
Recognizing the need to retool the contract management process, the legal industry has embraced new solutions. The market for contract management is expected to reach $3.2 billion globally by 2023.
In 2019 alone, disruptors in the legal technology space have received major investments. Aavenir, for example, is among the companies that are leading in the evolving CLM space. ContractPodAi, a U.K.-based AI powered CLM platform just secured $55 million in investment funding. Cloud-based contracts management firm Icertis also raised $115 million in funding this year.
As organizations invest in CLMs and other contract management solutions, it's important to look for collaborative capability or, rather, a true CCM solution. Without it, they'll be missing out on the full potential of contract management technology.
Monica Zent is an entrepreneur, investor, businesswoman and trusted legal adviser to leading global brands, over a period that spans decades. She is the founder of leading legal services company, ZentLaw and its innovative ZentLaw Labs. She is also the founder of LawDesk360, the workflow efficiency platform for legal departments and law firms. When she's not running companies, Zent runs distance as an endurance athlete.@monicazent
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250