FTC Official Urges State Attorneys General to Sue Google Over Kids' Privacy Violations
The Google penalty was part of a settlement with Federal Trade Commission general counsel Alden Abbott and New York Attorney General Letitia James. A dissenting FTC commissioner says other attorneys general should file lawsuits over the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act violations.
September 04, 2019 at 04:17 PM
4 minute read
Google LLC Wednesday agreed to pay a record $170 million penalty and make compliance changes after violating children's privacy rights. But one regulator said the settlement didn't go far enough and urged attorneys general nationwide to sue the company.
"More action is needed, and I hope that our partners in state attorneys' general offices can finish the job," said a statement from Federal Trade Commission Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, who dissented.
The Google penalty was part of a settlement with FTC general counsel Alden Abbott and New York Attorney General Letitia James. Under the deal, New York receives $34 million of the penalty.
A Google representative didn't respond to questions but referred Corporate Counsel to its statement, a lengthy blog post by YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki detailing its policies, products and practices. Wojcicki wrote, "Responsibility is our number one priority at YouTube, and nothing is more important than protecting kids and their privacy."
The joint complaint filed against Google and its online video platform, YouTube, accused the companies of displaying content for children, gathering and tracking the viewer data, and then targeting ads at those children. The complaint said their conduct violated the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA.
"Just as the attorney general of New York contributed to bringing this action," Slaughter said, "the other 49 states' attorneys general remain empowered by COPPA to take action against the violations that we detail in the complaint."
Specifically, Slaughter wants the states to seek an injunction demanding that Google create a technological backstop to evaluate content and keep creators and YouTube honest about whether content is child-directed.
The complaint identified several content creators, including toy brands Mattel Inc. and Hasbro Inc., as well as the Cartoon Network.
Under COPPA, if content is directed to children, then it is illegal to collect personal information from those viewers without getting parental consent. Under Wednesday's settlement, YouTube must ask a content's creator to designate the content as child-directed or not.
If the creator designates it is for general audiences, then Google can collect viewer data and target ads, sharing the revenue with the creator. If the creator says it is child-directed content, then parental consent must be obtained first to gather viewer data and target ads.
Slaughter wants Google to be more responsible for identifying child-directed content, and not depend on the creators' honesty.
"My concern is with the vast universe of content creators who will conduct a different cost-benefit analysis in which the perceived payoff of monetizing child-directed content through [targeted] advertising outweighs the perceived risk of being caught violating COPPA," she said.
Slaughter, a Democrat appointee, was joined by fellow Democrat Commissioner Rohit Chopra in filing dissenting statements. Chopra noted it was the third time since 2011 that the commission has sanctioned Google for privacy violations.
Chopra went on to analyze Google's profits and, while the numbers are redacted in his statement, he suggests the company profited considerably more from its illegal behavior than it paid in the penalty.
"When Google pays a fine and still profits from misconduct, this is not a penalty," his statement said.
The three-person Republican majority on the commission found that the fine was substantial and adequate. Chairman Joseph Simons and Commissioner Christine Wilson issued a joint statement calling the settlement "groundbreaking" and a "significant victory" that sends a strong message to platforms.
Besides the penalty, the settlement requires Google and YouTube to maintain a system that permits creators to identify their child-directed content. The companies must notify creators that their content may be subject to the COPPA rule's obligations and provide annual compliance training for employees who deal with YouTube content creators.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
5 minute readGlobal Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Meta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Trending Stories
- 1Former U.S. Dept. of Education Attorney Suspended for Failure to Complete CLE Credits
- 2ArentFox Schiff Adds Global Complex Litigation Partner in Los Angeles
- 3Bittensor Hackers, Accused of Stealing Over $28 Million, Face Federal Lawsuit
- 4In Novel Oil and Gas Feud, 5th Circuit Gives Choice of Arbitration Venue
- 5Jury Seated in Glynn County Trial of Ex-Prosecutor Accused of Shielding Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250