Wanted: Lawyers Open to Risk Ready to Work in Growing Cannabis Industry
Two Major, Lindsey & Africa recruiters say in-house lawyers who likely take risks work in highly regulated industries. Those are the candidates cannabis companies are looking for.
September 04, 2019 at 04:19 PM
3 minute read
Finding attorneys with an appetite for risk has become one of the leading challenges for recruiting in-house attorneys to the cannabis industry, according to two in-house counsel recruiters at Major, Lindsey & Africa.
Gigi Birchfield, managing partner in the in-house group in the Los Angeles office, said because many lawyers are risk-averse, it can be difficult pulling them away from high-paying jobs in settled industries.
"Finding that person in a pool of qualified people who are willing and able to leave the security of what is probably a pretty good job is difficult," Birchfield said. "They're leaving something that is pretty certain and pretty highly paid."
For some of the newer cannabis companies, the compensation may not be what some in-house attorneys are used to. Ashley McCall, a director in the in-house group also in Los Angeles, said many attorneys who would be entering the cannabis industry are already highly paid.
"[Cannabis companies] are still in the very early stages and the compensation ranges may be below market. It has to be someone that has enough faith in the company to take an equity share," McCall said.
|
➤➤ Get the latest cannabis law news and updates straight to your inbox with Higher Law, a weekly email briefing from Law.com. Sign up here.
The in-house lawyers likely to take the risks, Birchfield and McCall said, are those in highly regulated industries. They said their clients in the cannabis space are looking for lawyers heavily involved in regulatory issues.
"Our client was particularly interested in highly regulated industries like food or pharmaceuticals," Birchfield said. "A lot of those people [in those industries] are already doing dives into cannabis. Those folks tend to be a little bit more open to the prospect of working in the [cannabis] industry."
There are a few signs recruiters look for when determining risk before presenting a candidate to a cannabis company.
"At least on paper it's interesting to see if they've made a move from Big Law to in-house or from big pharma to a startup. Until we get them on the phone it's hard to assess how they react to cannabis specifically," McCall said.
Generally speaking, McCall said cannabis companies are not looking for "someone who is overly enthusiastic" about cannabis itself, since that "would have turned off one of our clients."
"They want someone who can look at the industry and see the industry is going to blow up," Birchfield said. "Our clients do want candidates who are passionate about their company as opposed to the industry at large."
Many cannabis companies in the past year have made efforts to hire general counsel and are now looking to fill out their legal departments.
Birchfield and McCall said companies are looking to fill their in-house legal teams with attorneys who have experience in handling regulation, commercial and mergers and acquisitions, and intellectual property.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBusiness Case for DEI Is Still Strong, Experts Say, but Many Companies Approach Topic Clumsily
In-House Counsel Saw Pay Rise Over Past Year, Despite Drop in Job-Hopping
Major Lindsey & Africa 'Blackballed' Associate Who Sued Troutman, Suit Claims
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250